LSAT-CR

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:15 am
Location: India
Thanked: 13 times

LSAT-CR

by gauravgundal » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:38 pm
Throughout European history famines have generally been followed by period of rising wages, because when a labor force is diminished, workers are more valuable in accordance with the law of supply and demand. The Irish potato famine of the 1840s is an exception; it resulted in the death or emigration of half of Ireland's population, but there was no significant rise in the average wages in Ireland in the following decade.
Which one of the following, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the exception to the generalization?
(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels.
(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers.
(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor.
(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine.
(E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor.

Y OA - D Y not C.




Source : Offical LSAT paper..

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:26 am
Received a PM asking me to reply. First, I should say that I personally don't think LSAT CR is a good way to study for GMAT CR. I think there are enough differences that we shouldn't use the two comparably. But I know other GMAT teachers disagree.

E hist:
famine, then higher wages
reason: fewer workers
so: famine --> fewer workers than needed --> higher wages
IP famine didn't work that way though
half of pop went away, but wages didn't rise

"LEAST" contribute to exception - so four answers will try to explain why the IP famine was an exception, and one won't. That one is the right answer.

A) After the famine, people began to live longer, which disrupts the "fewer workers" part of the equation. Okay, that could explain why wages didn't rise.
B) Ah, if most of the people who left weren't workers anyway, then that also disrupts the "fewer workers" part of the equation.
C) This disrupts the "than needed" part of the equation. There may not be fewer than needed if they don't need as many workers.
D) Lots more babies born during the decade after. Are those babies going to replace the workers that were lost? Not within that decade - they're babies / little kids. So you apparently still have fewer workers than needed... so why didn't the wages go up?
E) they weren't allowed to raise wages... that would explain it!
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:27 am

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:00 pm
I like the explanation on D