Critical Reasoning

Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.
Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author's claims above?
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices.
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.
III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III

sridevipavan wrote:Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.
Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author's claims above?
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices.
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.
III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III

IMO D.

I clearly supports authors claim.
II is also supporting as it is saying that $1 subsidy cost consumer and taxpayer $4 assumption here is ethanol production can lead to food inflation, subsidy could encourage farmers to produce more ethanol..
III is out of scope.

SO IMO D, what is OA?

IMO B. OA please

IMO B

Definitely in the right answer has to be II. Option I can also be true, but we cannot say if this amount of money is a lot or not and there is no connection to the consumers and what affect it has on them.

IMO D