Source - Grockit
Professional Tennis players, similar to professionals in other sports, exhibit different strengths such as serving with seppd and accuracy, performing with endurance and run swiftly even late in match, and defending against tricky drop shots and lobs.
performing with endurance and run
performing with endurance and running
performing with endurance running
to perform with endurance and to run
to perform with endurance and run
OA B, IMO C
Please explain
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:15 pm
- Followed by:1 members
Hi Sudhanshu,
I'm new to this game of GMAT, just started but would try answering.
Due to parallelism, we should have performing ....running (...defending), leaving us options B & C.
C- in my view does not have the correct grammar---endurance running swiftly......., so answer is B.
I'm new to this game of GMAT, just started but would try answering.
Due to parallelism, we should have performing ....running (...defending), leaving us options B & C.
C- in my view does not have the correct grammar---endurance running swiftly......., so answer is B.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:3 members
also dunnot understand why B is correct... and ...and...reply2spg wrote:Source - Grockit
Professional Tennis players, similar to professionals in other sports, exhibit different strengths such as serving with seppd and accuracy, performing with endurance and run swiftly even late in match, and defending against tricky drop shots and lobs.
performing with endurance and run
performing with endurance and running
performing with endurance running
to perform with endurance and to run
to perform with endurance and run
OA B, IMO C
- reply2spg
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- GMAT Score:570
Yes that is what my question is. Since you have 'performing with endurance and running' means list should end after 'and running'. But it is not correct, since list is continued in non underlined portion, in that case how come B is correct here?
Confused
Confused
diebeatsthegmat wrote:also dunnot understand why B is correct... and ...and...reply2spg wrote:Source - Grockit
Professional Tennis players, similar to professionals in other sports, exhibit different strengths such as serving with seppd and accuracy, performing with endurance and run swiftly even late in match, and defending against tricky drop shots and lobs.
performing with endurance and run
performing with endurance and running
performing with endurance running
to perform with endurance and to run
to perform with endurance and run
OA B, IMO C
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
- Thanked: 70 times
- Followed by:6 members
Okay. The big battle is between B and C.
The only way in which C would have been correct is if there were a comma before running. Since this is not the case, we can safely say that C is not right.
As for the justification of B, performing with endurance and running swiftly even late in match are not independent but related to each other. running swiftly even late in match qualifies performing with endurance. So an and before running is justified. The final and just ends the list.
The following things are parallel -
- serving with speed and accuracy
- performing with endurance and running swiftly even late in match
and,
- defending against tricky drop shots and lobs
You can make the case that and does not necessarily show the relation very well but I don't see a better way out.
The only way in which C would have been correct is if there were a comma before running. Since this is not the case, we can safely say that C is not right.
As for the justification of B, performing with endurance and running swiftly even late in match are not independent but related to each other. running swiftly even late in match qualifies performing with endurance. So an and before running is justified. The final and just ends the list.
The following things are parallel -
- serving with speed and accuracy
- performing with endurance and running swiftly even late in match
and,
- defending against tricky drop shots and lobs
You can make the case that and does not necessarily show the relation very well but I don't see a better way out.
scio me nihil scire