If the operation @ is one of + - * or /, is (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)
a. 3 @ 2 > 3
b. 3 @ 1 = 3
ans is A !...can anyone pls explain...Thanks..
ds question
This topic has expert replies
- ganesh prasath
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:09 pm
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
Please post DS questions under appropriate forum.ganesh prasath wrote:If the operation @ is one of + - * or /, is (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)
a. 3 @ 2 > 3
b. 3 @ 1 = 3
ans is A !...can anyone pls explain...Thanks..
(1) 3 @ 2 > 3
3 + 2 = 5 > 3, true
3 - 2 = 1 > 3, not true
3 * 2 = 6 > 3, true.
3/2 = 1.5 > 3, not true.
This means @ symbol can be "+" or "*".
Now, If @ = "+", then (6 @ 2) @ 4 = (6 + 2) + 4 = 12, and 6 @ (2 @ 4) = 6 + (2 + 4) = 12
If @ = "*", then (6 @ 2) @ 4 = (6 * 2) * 4 = 48, and 6 @ (2 @ 4) = 6 * (2 * 4) = 6 * 8 = 48
It can be seen that in both the cases, (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)holds true.
So (1) is SUFFICIENT.
(2) 3 @ 1 = 3
3 + 1 = 4 = 3, not true
3 - 1 = 2 = 3, not true
3 * 1 = 3 = 3, true
3/1 = 3 = 3, true
This means @ symbol can be "*" or "/".
Now, If @ = "*", then (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4) holds true (as done is st 1)
If @ = "/", then (6 @ 2) @ 4 = (6 / 2) / 4 = 0.75, and 6 @ (2 @ 4) = 6 / (2 / 4) = 6 / (1/2) = 12
No definite answer
So (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is A.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
- manpsingh87
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
- Thanked: 72 times
- Followed by:6 members
1) 3@2>3;ganesh prasath wrote:If the operation @ is one of + - * or /, is (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)
a. 3 @ 2 > 3
b. 3 @ 1 = 3
ans is A !...can anyone pls explain...Thanks..
now here two @ can have two possible values either * or +;
lets put * in place of @ in equation (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4);
we have; (6 * 2) * 4 = 48;
6 * (2 * 4)=48;
now put + in place of @ in equation (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4);
we have (6 + 2) + 4 = 12;
6 + (2 + 4)=12;
since equation (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4) holds true for both +, and * hence A alone is sufficient to answer the question.
2)3 @ 1 = 3; now here two possible values of @ is * and /;
lets put * in place of @ in the equation (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4);
(6 * 2) * 4 = 48;
6 * (2 * 4)=48;
now put / in place of @ in equation (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4);
(6 / 2) / 4 =3/4;
6 / (2 / 4) =12;
as the equation (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4) holds true for @=* and it doesn't hold true for @=/; therefore 2 alone is not sufficient to answer the question;
hence answer should be A
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
This has been deleted
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
- Ashley@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am
- Location: Cambridge, MA
- Thanked: 192 times
- Followed by:121 members
- GMAT Score:780
Hey there,
So we've got four possibilities for what @ represents: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
First we see which ones of these possibilities remain viable given the info in statement (1): 3 @ 2 > 3. Well, @ could be addition, because indeed, 3 + 2 > 3, and it could be multiplication, because indeed 3 * 2 > 3. It could NOT, however, represent subtraction or division, because neither 3 - 2 nor 3 / 2 is greater than 3. So we've got some ambiguity as to what @ actually represents, but it turns out that regardless of whether it is * or +,
Now we look at Statement (2). In order for statement (2) to be true, @ could represent multiplication or division, since 3 * 1 and 3 / 1 are both 3; @ canNOT, however, equal addition or subtraction, since neither 3 + 1 nor 3 - 1 equals 3. If @ represents multiplication, the answer to the question is YES, as shown above. But if @ represents division, the answer to the question will be NO. We can anticipate this "NO" based on the fact that division is NOT associative, but we can also derive it: (6/2)/4 = 3/4, whereas 6/(2/4) = 6/(1/2) = 12. 3/4 does not equal 12, so (as anticipated) NO. Since statement (2) leaves us unsure whether to say YES or NO, it is INSUFFICIENT.
The takeaway here (with regard to statement 1) is this: the fact that there's some ambiguity *on the way* to the answer (that is, we can't determine whether @ represents * or +) does NOT necessarily mean we won't land at a definitive answer. Quite often all of several possible paths converge to one answer, and that's what we need to care about.
Hope that helps!
So we've got four possibilities for what @ represents: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
First we see which ones of these possibilities remain viable given the info in statement (1): 3 @ 2 > 3. Well, @ could be addition, because indeed, 3 + 2 > 3, and it could be multiplication, because indeed 3 * 2 > 3. It could NOT, however, represent subtraction or division, because neither 3 - 2 nor 3 / 2 is greater than 3. So we've got some ambiguity as to what @ actually represents, but it turns out that regardless of whether it is * or +,
We can say that these two quantities will be equal even without bothering to do the computation, because we know that addition and multiplication are both associative. [If we want to prove this to ourselves with concrete numbers, though... if @ represents addition, we wind up with 8 + 4 equaling 6 + 6 (12 equaling 12); if @ represents multiplication, we wind up with 12 * 4 equaling 6 * 8 (48 equaling 48).] So from statement (1) we can answer the question with a definitive YES and say SUFFICIENT.(6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)
Now we look at Statement (2). In order for statement (2) to be true, @ could represent multiplication or division, since 3 * 1 and 3 / 1 are both 3; @ canNOT, however, equal addition or subtraction, since neither 3 + 1 nor 3 - 1 equals 3. If @ represents multiplication, the answer to the question is YES, as shown above. But if @ represents division, the answer to the question will be NO. We can anticipate this "NO" based on the fact that division is NOT associative, but we can also derive it: (6/2)/4 = 3/4, whereas 6/(2/4) = 6/(1/2) = 12. 3/4 does not equal 12, so (as anticipated) NO. Since statement (2) leaves us unsure whether to say YES or NO, it is INSUFFICIENT.
The takeaway here (with regard to statement 1) is this: the fact that there's some ambiguity *on the way* to the answer (that is, we can't determine whether @ represents * or +) does NOT necessarily mean we won't land at a definitive answer. Quite often all of several possible paths converge to one answer, and that's what we need to care about.
Hope that helps!
Last edited by Ashley@VeritasPrep on Sun May 29, 2011 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep
Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep
Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
- edvhou812
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:06 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:1 members
This question is a pain since it is basically asking you to eliminate possibilities. I am going to change DS options A and B respectively since they are traditionally called '1' and '2' in the exam.ganesh prasath wrote:If the operation @ is one of + - * or /, is (6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)
a. 3 @ 2 > 3
b. 3 @ 1 = 3
ans is A !...can anyone pls explain...Thanks..
1. 3 @ 2 > 3 can be 3+1>3 or 3*2>3
2. 3 @ 1 = 3 can be 3*1=3 or 3/1=3
With this info alone, we know nothing. Now we need to eliminate possibilities. I will call 3+1>3 '1a', 3*2>3 '1b' and so on.
(6 @ 2) @ 4 = 6 @ (2 @ 4)
1a: (6+2)+4= 6+(2+4) => 12 = 12 (Works)
1b: (6*2)*4 = 6*(6*4) = 48=96 (Does not work)
For the sake of brevity, you can find that the multiplication and division options from DS item #2 do not work. Since adding from DS item #1 is the only operation that works, the answer is A.