Hello
Can someone plz point out my mistake. I think that considering we have a single constant for the equation I can add the linear equations up. But the OA is far away from my answer.
Thanks
The OA is 1900
Expenses of a hotel
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
x is directly proportional to y means the following:
x = ky, where k is a constant.
In the problem above, let n = the number of occupants, v = the variable expense, and c = the constant expense.
Total expenses = v + c.
Since the variable expense is directly proportional to the number of occupants, we get:
v = kn.
Thus:
Total expenses = kn + c, where n is the number of occupants, and k and c are constants.
200 occupants:
Total expenses = kn + c.
1300 = 200k + c.
250 occupants:
Total expenses = kn + c.
1600 = 250k + c.
Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:
1600-1300 = (250k + c) - (200k + c)
300 = 50k
k = 6.
Substituting k=6 into 1300 = 200k + c, we get:
1300 = 200*6 = c
c = 100.
Total expenses for 300 inmates:
Total = kn + c = 6*300 + 100 = 1900.
x = ky, where k is a constant.
In the problem above, let n = the number of occupants, v = the variable expense, and c = the constant expense.
Total expenses = v + c.
Since the variable expense is directly proportional to the number of occupants, we get:
v = kn.
Thus:
Total expenses = kn + c, where n is the number of occupants, and k and c are constants.
200 occupants:
Total expenses = kn + c.
1300 = 200k + c.
250 occupants:
Total expenses = kn + c.
1600 = 250k + c.
Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:
1600-1300 = (250k + c) - (200k + c)
300 = 50k
k = 6.
Substituting k=6 into 1300 = 200k + c, we get:
1300 = 200*6 = c
c = 100.
Total expenses for 300 inmates:
Total = kn + c = 6*300 + 100 = 1900.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- faraz_jeddah
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:46 am
- Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Thanked: 42 times
- Followed by:7 members
- GMAT Score:730
I solved it in a similar way
200 --> 1300
250 --> 1600
An increase of 50 inmates = an increase of RS 300
An increasse of 100 (50*2) inmates = 2 * (increase of RS300) = 1300 + 600 = 1900
200 --> 1300
250 --> 1600
An increase of 50 inmates = an increase of RS 300
An increasse of 100 (50*2) inmates = 2 * (increase of RS300) = 1300 + 600 = 1900