RBBmba@2014 wrote:Thanks GMATGuruNY.
Just curious to know whether the following structure would be correct ?
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, fewer than [people] have been killed by bee stings.
It should make sense, I guess. Thoughts ?
When ellipsis serves to convert a sentence into a modifier, one constraint is that the resulting modifier cannot include a complete clause.
Since the insertion of
people forms a complete clause --
people have been killed by bee stings -- this revision is not viable.
GMATGuruNY wrote:
1.seven people have been killed (subject + verb) and the ones who are killed (pronoun + who-modifier) are NOT parallel forms.
2. E: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, fewer than the ones killed by bee stings.
E incorrectly compares a VERB (have been killed) to a MODIFIER (the killed in red)
And are the above TWO
ALWAYS considered wrong (as
non-PARALLEL FORMS in COMPARISON SC) on GMAT ?
Why it'd be wrong to consider Verb-ed Modifier as IMPLIED Passive Voice, and hence PARALLEL to the MAIN VERB in active voice ?
A VERB and a MODIFIER will always be considered NONPARALLEL forms.
E:
the ones killed by bee stings
Here,
killed is a MODIFIER.
No other interpretation is viable.
Thus, it is incorrect to compare
the ones killed (pronoun + modifier) to
people have been killed (subject + verb).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at
[email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3