- [email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:44 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
A group of experimental subjects participated in an "intermittent fasting" study, under which they ate all of their food for the day within six hours of waking up. The subjects consumed the same number of calories as they normally did throughout an entire day and did not change their exercise patterns. Nearly all of the subjects lost a significant amount of weight during the study. It can thus be concluded that eating all of one's food within a relatively short period of time causes the body to burn more calories.
Which of the following must be assumed for the argument above to be valid?
The most important time for a meal, from the standpoint of weight management, is early in the day.
Intermittent fasting protocols are safe and free of major side effects, even when pursued for long periods of time.
People are unable to consume as many calories within an interval of a few hours as they can over the course of an entire day
People eating on an intermittent-fasting protocol will not feel substantially hungrier than those who space out their meals more regularly.
The body does not generally burn calories faster when food is eaten earlier in a person's waking hours than when it is eaten later.
I want to know why D is not the answer and how did we reach at the answer. Also, I am facing a lot of issues with assumption problems. Do we have a full proof strategy in place for tackling these questions?
Which of the following must be assumed for the argument above to be valid?
The most important time for a meal, from the standpoint of weight management, is early in the day.
Intermittent fasting protocols are safe and free of major side effects, even when pursued for long periods of time.
People are unable to consume as many calories within an interval of a few hours as they can over the course of an entire day
People eating on an intermittent-fasting protocol will not feel substantially hungrier than those who space out their meals more regularly.
The body does not generally burn calories faster when food is eaten earlier in a person's waking hours than when it is eaten later.
I want to know why D is not the answer and how did we reach at the answer. Also, I am facing a lot of issues with assumption problems. Do we have a full proof strategy in place for tackling these questions?












