I just started my preparations for the GMAT and am going through a couple of CR books.
With regards to how to approach the Argument question, both the books differ in their approach.
On one side, the "GMAT Critical Reasoning Bible" by PowerSource, states "Read the parts in the order given...some GMAT texts advocate reading the question stem before the reading the stimulus. We are certain that these texts are seriously mistaken." It sites a few reasons.
On the other side, the "Princeton - Verbal Workout for the GMAT" states "When you see an Argument question, train yourself to read the question first." It also states a couple of reasons.
Both being well reputed in this area, I'm confused as to whose advise to take and which approach to follow.
Suggestions?
With regards to how to approach the Argument question, both the books differ in their approach.
On one side, the "GMAT Critical Reasoning Bible" by PowerSource, states "Read the parts in the order given...some GMAT texts advocate reading the question stem before the reading the stimulus. We are certain that these texts are seriously mistaken." It sites a few reasons.
On the other side, the "Princeton - Verbal Workout for the GMAT" states "When you see an Argument question, train yourself to read the question first." It also states a couple of reasons.
Both being well reputed in this area, I'm confused as to whose advise to take and which approach to follow.
Suggestions?












