Descriptive Statistics

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:51 pm

Descriptive Statistics

by anusheelp » Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:07 am
The average of 5 distinct single digit integers is 5. If two of the integers are discarded, the new average is 4. What is the largest of the 5 integers?

(1) Exactly 3 of the integers are consecutive primes.

(2) The smallest integer is 3.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:14 am
anusheelp wrote:The average of 5 distinct single digit integers is 5. If two of the integers are discarded, the new average is 4. What is the largest of the 5 integers?

(1) Exactly 3 of the integers are consecutive primes.

(2) The smallest integer is 3.
Since the average of the 5 integers is 5, the sum of all 5 integers = 5*5 = 25.
After 2 integers are discarded, the average of the remaining 3 integers is 4, implying that the sum of the remaining 3 integers = 3*4 = 12.
Thus, the sum of the 2 discarded integers = 25-12 = 13.
Thus, the correct set of 5 integers must exhibit the following characteristics:
The integers are distinct and between 0 and 9, inclusive.
The sum of all 5 integers is 25.
The sum of 3 of the integers is 12.
The sum of the other 2 integers is 13.


Statement 1: Exactly 3 of the integers are consecutive primes.
Case 1: 2,3,5
Thus, the options for the remaining 2 integers are 0,1,4,6,8,9.
Since 2+3+5 = 10, the sum of the remaining 2 integers = 25-10 = 15.
Only one combination works: 6+9.
Thus, the 5 integers would be 2,3,5,6,9.
This list does not include two integers whose sum is 13.

Case 2: 3,5,7
Thus, the options for the remaining 2 integers are 0,1,4,6,8,9.
Since 3+5+7 = 15, the sum of the remaining 2 integers = 25-15 = 10.
Only two combinations work: 1+9 and 4+6.
Thus, the 5 integers are either 1,3,5,7,9 or 3,4,5,6,7.
Only the second option includes two integers with a sum of 13 (6+7=13).
Thus, the 5 integers are 3,4,5,6,7.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: The smallest integer is 3.
We know from statement 1 that 3,4,5,6,7 works.
For the smallest integer to be 3, the sum of the remaining 4 integers must be 25-3 = 22.
Given that these remaining 4 integers must each be greater than 3, there are no options aside from 4+5+6+7 = 22.
Thus, the 5 integers are 3,4,5,6,7.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 10:10 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by everything's eventual » Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:21 am
The sum of the 5 distinct integers is 25.

The sum of the two number which were removed is 13.
Sum of remaining 3 numbers is 12.

1) Exactly 3 of the integers are consecutive primes.

Lets consider 3,5 and 7. Sum of these 3 are 15. Remaining is 10.

We can have 2 + 8 = 10 or 1 + 9 = 10 or even -2 + 12.

So not sufficient.

2) Smallest integer is 3.

Lets add the consecutive starting 3.

3+4+5+6+7 = 25

7 has to be the greatest number. If the greatest number is greater than 7 then the smallest number will become smaller than 3 which is against what is given in statement 2).

IMO [spoiler]B)[/spoiler]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 10:10 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by everything's eventual » Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:23 am
Dear GMAT GURUNY

The integers are distinct and between 0 and 9, inclusive.
I am sorry but I do not understand why we should not consider negative numbers too.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 10:10 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by everything's eventual » Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:25 am
Got it....silly one..

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:51 pm

by anusheelp » Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:37 am
Thanks GMATGuruNY.

I arrived at the same result. However, the OA listed was A, so wanted an expert's response.