It's so hard to analyze this problem :)

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:48 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

It's so hard to analyze this problem :)

by amirhakimi » Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:55 am
Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

(A)Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated

(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated

(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oilfields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating

(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oilfields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated

(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

Answer is B
Sincerely,
Amir,

The only place that "Success" comes before "Trying" is in the dictionary!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:56 pm
Hi amirhakimi,

The structure of this SC is based heavily on proper "style" and understanding its "intent." Here's how I solved it:

1) Style: Active Voice ("subject" appears before "action") is how most SCs are supposed to be written. While there are some circumstances in which the "passive voice" is acceptable, they're not nearly as frequent as correct answers written in the active voice. The subject of this prompt is the "maritime code", the action is "provides"

2) Intent: The end of the underlined-portion mentions how something either "stimulated" or is "stimulating" disputes. So WHAT is causing these disputes? I would deduce that the "new maritime code" is causing these disputes. The maritime code is a SINGULAR noun, so we need the grammar to match that.

Answer B gives us active voice and properly references the singular subject.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:00 am
amirhakimi wrote:Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

(A)Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated

(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated

(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oilfields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating

(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oilfields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated

(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

Answer is B
Alternate approach:

In A, they lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate A.

A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to express an action attributed to the preceding SUBJECT.
In C, stimulating seems to refer to islets -- the subject of the preceding clause -- implying that the ISLETS are stimulating international disputes.
The intended meaning of the sentence is that the MARITIME CODE is stimulating international disputes.
Eliminate C.

In D, this lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate D.

E lacks a subject. The result is an incomplete sentence.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:29 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:680

by Resp007 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:51 pm
HI Mitch,

I do agree with all the explanations and the answer.

However (!), in C, isn't it lacking an independent clause? i.e. I find it has no main sentence! but two dependent clauses separated by commas. Think just like in E, which has dependent clause "Because.." and the clause after comma i.e " , which..." is just a modifier. What say?

Thanks,
Resp007

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Nov 16, 2013 5:31 am
Resp007 wrote:HI Mitch,

I do agree with all the explanations and the answer.

However (!), in C, isn't it lacking an independent clause? i.e. I find it has no main sentence! but two dependent clauses separated by commas. Think just like in E, which has dependent clause "Because.." and the clause after comma i.e " , which..." is just a modifier. What say?

Thanks,
Resp007
C contains the following independent clause:
Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims.
Subject = islets.
Verb = can be.
Don't be thrown off by the presence of even, which serves as a modifier.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:33 am

by vishalpathak » Thu Nov 28, 2013 12:22 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
amirhakimi wrote:Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

(A)Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated

(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated

(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oilfields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating

(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oilfields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated

(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

Answer is B
Alternate approach:

In A, they lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate A.

A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to express an action attributed to the preceding SUBJECT.
In C, stimulating seems to refer to islets -- the subject of the preceding clause -- implying that the ISLETS are stimulating international disputes.
The intended meaning of the sentence is that the MARITIME CODE is stimulating international disputes.
Eliminate C.

In D, this lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate D.

E lacks a subject. The result is an incomplete sentence.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is B.
Hi Mitch,

Thanks for helping us understand this.

I am not able to find the antecedent of 'it' in option B. Please help me with this

Regards,
Vishal

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:32 pm
Location: Orange, TX
Thanked: 66 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:760

by ilyana » Thu Nov 28, 2013 2:53 am
Hello, Vishal!

The antecedent of "it" in B is "the new maritime code" (the subject of the preceding clause).
Please click on "Thank" button if you think my post is helpful.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ilyana-anderson-481846127/