Hello Experts,
Whats the simplest way to solve this question?
Thanks
Median Compensation
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:38 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:4 members
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:34 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Hi [email protected],
The way I would do this question is as follows,
Change in median base salary from 1999-2000 = 14%
It means the salary in 2000 is 14% higher than that of 2000. Let the salary in 1999 be x
So, salary in 2000 = salary in 1999 + 14% of salary in 1999
100000 = x + 0.14x
100000 = 1.14x
x = 100000/1.14 = 87719.298
The answer closest to this value in the option is 87700.
Cheers
Sukriti
The way I would do this question is as follows,
Change in median base salary from 1999-2000 = 14%
It means the salary in 2000 is 14% higher than that of 2000. Let the salary in 1999 be x
So, salary in 2000 = salary in 1999 + 14% of salary in 1999
100000 = x + 0.14x
100000 = 1.14x
x = 100000/1.14 = 87719.298
The answer closest to this value in the option is 87700.
Cheers
Sukriti
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The chart indicates that the median base salary for 2000 -- 100,000 -- is 14% greater than the median base salary for 1999.
We can PLUG IN THE ANSWERS, which represent an approximation of the median base salary for 1999.
When 14% is added to the correct answer choice, the result must be approximately 100,000.
Since the median base salary for 1999 can be determined, eliminate E.
Since the median base salary for 1999 must be LESS than the base salary for 2000, eliminate D.
Answer choice C: 87000
87000 + (14/100 * 87000) = 87000 + 12180 = 99180.
Since the other answer choices are SMALLER, they will yield a value less than 99,180 and FURTHER from 100,000.
The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Shibsriz,
Each of the responses to your question provides a proper math explanation, so there's nothing to add there. In situations that involve a percent change from one year to the next, it's important that you follow this rule: "math moves forwards"
Here, the mean salary in 2000 was 14% GREATER than the mean salary in 1999. You MUST do the math "forwards" from 1999 to 2000. Setting up the equation would yield:
X = salary in 1999
X + .14X = 1.14X = salary in 2000
Some people make the mistake of trying to go "backwards" with the math. The math doesn't work that way though, so make sure that you're doing your percent change calculations forwards.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Each of the responses to your question provides a proper math explanation, so there's nothing to add there. In situations that involve a percent change from one year to the next, it's important that you follow this rule: "math moves forwards"
Here, the mean salary in 2000 was 14% GREATER than the mean salary in 1999. You MUST do the math "forwards" from 1999 to 2000. Setting up the equation would yield:
X = salary in 1999
X + .14X = 1.14X = salary in 2000
Some people make the mistake of trying to go "backwards" with the math. The math doesn't work that way though, so make sure that you're doing your percent change calculations forwards.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
The table tells us that the median salary in 2000 was 14% greater than the median salary in 1999.
IMPORTANT: A lot of students look at this and conclude (incorrectly) that the median salary in 1999 was 14% LESS than the median salary in 2000.
This is a common error that the the GMAT loves to test. In fact, answer choice B ($86000) is the incorrect answer choice that many students will choose.
This misconception is so prevalent among the general public that I wrote an article about it last month: https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2014/05/ ... ts-part-ii
Cheers,
Brent
IMPORTANT: A lot of students look at this and conclude (incorrectly) that the median salary in 1999 was 14% LESS than the median salary in 2000.
This is a common error that the the GMAT loves to test. In fact, answer choice B ($86000) is the incorrect answer choice that many students will choose.
This misconception is so prevalent among the general public that I wrote an article about it last month: https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2014/05/ ... ts-part-ii
Cheers,
Brent