-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2025 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
4 Steps to Analyze your CATs (part 2)
Welcome back! If you havent already, start with part 1 of this series, where we discussed how to begin your analysis of your test data. Lets continue with a deeper dive of the per-question timing data from your Problem List. (And grab pen and paper to take notesthis is going to begeeky.)
Analyze your timing
Even if your cumulative time was fine, you might still exhibit a very common problem: up and down timing. This is when you spend way too much time on some problems and then speed up on others to catch back up. Your overall timing works out, but you still have a serious timing imbalance on individual problems.
The tables below show the rough timing categories to watch out for, by problem type, along with some commentary afterward about how to use the tables. (Dont start your analysis till youve read this whole section.)
Quant and IR | Too (?) Fast | Warning Track | Too Slow |
PS or DS | < 1m | approaching 3m | > 3m |
IR* | < 1.5m | approaching 4m | > 4m |
*IR assumes that you will bail (guess quickly) on 2 or 3 questions in that section.
Notice what I did for the warning track: its basically getting close to the Too Slow time. Im just going to pay attention to how often I come close to Too Slow without actually going over.
Its fine to have some Warning Track questionsjust be careful not to have so many that youre causing yourself big headaches elsewhere.
Averages for Verbal questions vary by type, so for Verbal, I recommend examining one type at a time.
Verbal Type | Too (?) Fast | Warning Track | Too Slow |
SC | < 30s | approaching 2m | > 2m |
CR | < 1m | approaching 3m | > 3m |
RC: 1st question** | < 3m | approaching 5.5m | > 5.5m |
RC: general Qs | < 30s | approaching 2m | > 2m |
RC: specific Qs | < 1m | approaching 2.5m | > 2.5m |
**The first RC question includes the time it takes to read the passage.
Now. How to use all of the above?
Too Fast has a question mark after the Too (?) because there are two great reasons to have a really fast problem:
(1) You knew exactly what you were doing and you got it rightfast.
(2) You knew you didnt know how to do it and you guessedfast.
However, if I miss something I knew how to do because I made a careless mistakeI have a timing problem. Or if I misread the problem because I was rushing throughditto.
From now on, when I say Too Fast, Im referring specifically to the not-good reasons. When you have a good reason to go fast, its not too fast.
Too Slow is too slow even if you got the problem right. When you take that much time, you just cause yourself problems elsewhere in the section.
Now, in your Problem List, click on the Time column header. This will re-sort the questions from fastest to slowest (you can click it again to sort from slowest to fastest). Examine the problems by time, using the tables as a guide.
- How many too fast questions did you think you were getting right but you missed? Or you did get right but got lucky? Or you missed but think you could have gotten right if youd only had time to try it properly?
- How many too slow questions did you miss? Look at the problemsat what point should you have cut yourself off and guessed?
- Did you have any crazy-slow problems (e.g. a minute beyond the Too Slow time)? Even if you got it right, maybe you should have gotten it wrong much faster and spent that time elsewhere.
How was your timing?
If you have more than a couple of questions in the too fast or too slow categories (regardless of whether theyre right or wrong), then youve got a timing problem. For example, if you had 4 questions over 3m each, then you almost certainly missed other questions elsewhere simply due to speedthat extra time had to come from somewhere. And chances are it came from a too fast problem on which you made a mistake.
Alternatively, if there is even one that is very far over the too slow mark, you have a timing problem. If you have one quant question on which you spent 4m30s, you might let yourself do this on more questions on the real testand there goes your score. (By the way, the only potentially acceptable reason is: I was at the end of the section and knew I had extra time, so I used it. And my next question would be: what about saving that mental energy for the next section of the test? :))
For each section of the test, get a general sense of whether there is:
- not much of a timing problem (e.g., only 1 or 2 questions in the too fast or too slow rangeand not way too slow),
- a small timing problem (e.g., 3-5 questions in the warning track range, or a couple of problems in the too slow category, plus a few too fast questions), or
- a larger timing problem (e.g., 5+ questions in the warning track range, or 3+ questions that are too slow or some that are way too slow, plus multiple too fast questions).
Note that I dont specify above whether the warning track and too slow questions were answered correctly or incorrectly. It isnt (necessarily) okay to spend too much time just because the question was answered correctly.
Next, what is that timing problem costing you? How many problems fit into the different categories? Approximately how much time total was spent on the too slow problems? How many too fast questions did that cost you or could it have cost you? Examine the problems themselves to locate careless errors. How many of your careless errors occurred when you were rushing or just plain tired out because youd spent too much mental effort elsewhere?
Finally, are there any patterns in terms of the content area? For example, perhaps 80% of the "too slow" quant problems were PS story problems or two of the "too slow" SC problems were modifier problems. Next time, were going to talk about how to use the assessment reports to dive more into this data, but do try to get a high level sense of any patterns that jump out at you.
All of the above allows you to quantify just how bad any timing problems are. Now, Im going to make a pronouncement that will wow you: You have a timing problem, dont you?
Actually, we all have timing problems. The question is just what yours are and how significant they are. If youre having trouble letting go on hard questions (and, really, arent we all?), learn how to make better decisions during the exam.
And one more thing: Take a look at part 1 of this article on Time Management. (Its a 3-parter. You dont have to look at all three parts now.)
Now were done looking at the problem lists. What have you learned about yourself? How do you think that should inform your studies for the next several weeks?
Join us next time, when well analyze the detailed data given in the assessment reports.
Recent Articles
- Acceptance Rates at Top MBA Programs – Should They Inform Your Application Strategy?
- How to Stand Out in Your MBA Application: What Really Matters
- 3 Regrets of Rejected MBA Applicants (and How to Avoid Them) | 2025 Edition
- The Best MBA Programs for Sustainability
- How to Have Impressive Extracurriculars When You’re Busy
Archive
- July 2025
- June 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009