-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Executive Assessment: Quant Strategies for Faster Solutions - Part 5
Welcome to the fifth installment of Quant Strategies for the EA! If youre just joining us now, head back to the first part and work your way back here.
Im super excited about the problem were going to talk about today. The textbook math is really annoyingbut theres a fantastic shortcut thats going to save us all kinds of time.
Try this Problem Solving (PS) problem from the official free EA practice set (labeled #1 in the PS set on the EA website, as of November 2017) and then well talk!
Dick and Jane each saved $3,000 in 1989. In 1990 Dick saved 8 percent more than in 1989, and together he and Jane saved a total of $5,000. Approximately what percent less did Jane save in 1990 than in 1989?(A) 8%
(B) 25%
(C) 41%
(D) 59%
(E) 70%
This problem is going to hinge on a strategy that we first discussed way back in the Fast Math for EA series. Glance at the answer choices. Notice anything?
Theyre seriously far apart. When the answers are that far apart, we dont have to solve for an exact number; we just need to estimate. In this case, we can estimate quite heavily.
Thats level 1 of the awesome solution. Heres how I found level 2.
(My thought process) Okay, so I know their starting points, $3k each in 89 (jotting down) and then D saved 8% more and then I know the new total for D and J, but I have to figure out by what percent J went down.
Ill have to figure out Ds new amount and then subtract from $5k to find Js new amount and then find what percent that is of Js original amount ugh. Thats annoying.
Is there an easier way? I know I can estimate (glancing at answers again)
And thats when it hit me. I could just try the answers and see which one works. Theyre so very far apart that I can estimate quite heavily, and theyre in order, so all Ill need to try is (B) and (D); if those ones arent right, Ill be able to tell whether I need to go higher or lower.
Lets do this!
Dick started with $3k and saved 8% more. I know I can estimate heavily, so lets call that 10%way easier. So he saved $3,300 in 1990. (Note: That arrow signals to me that Ive overestimated; the real value is a little under $3,300. This is a good habit to get into when estimating, just to make surethough the answers are so far apart in this problem that I probably dont need to keep track of this.)
Okay, back to the problem. Together, D and J saved $5k, so J must have saved about $1,700. (Really, a little bit more, since D is a little less than $3,300.)
In 1989, J saved $3,000. Check the answers to see which percent less gets us down to about $1,700. Start with answer (B). (In general, start with answer B or D when working backwards.)
(B) 25%. First, take 25% of $3,000.
Divide by 4: thats $750.
Now, subtract $750 from $3,000.
What do you get? Hmm, $2,250.
Thats too much left; shes only supposed to have $1,700 left.
So (B) is not the correct answer; cross it off.
Should the correct percentage be higher or lower?
We need her to have saved less, so she needs to have lost more. The percentage should be greater than 25%.
Next, go to (D), 59%. Thats about 60%. Glance at the problem details again. She started at $3,000 and needs to go down to about $1,700. That means she still keeps more than half (half would be $1,500), so she cant have lost 60%. She must have lost less.
Go look at the answers. Theres only one thats more than 25% but less than 59%: answer (C), 41%.
If you want to check your reasoning, do the numbers make sense generally? She started at $3k and is now at about $1,700. Does it make sense that she lost about 40%?
Yes! That (roughly) seems about rightshe kept a couple of hundred dollars more than she would have if shed lost exactly 50%. Done!
The correct answer is (C).
I could show you the textbook algebra herebut Im not going to. I want you to get into the same habit that I have. Im not okay with just plugging and chugging away at algebra. Most of the time on this test, I dont need toso why make the test experience any more annoying than it has to be? Start looking for opportunities to make this test easier.
Key Takeaways for EA Quant Strategies:
(1) Get into the habit of glancing at the answers before you decide how to solve. If the answers are really far apart, you can most likely estimatethe farther apart they are, the more heavily you can estimate.
(2) If the answers are also relatively nice numbers (as in this case: They are about 10%, 25%, 40%, 60% and 70%, all nice percentages), then you may also be able to Work Backwardsjust try the answers to see what works. When you have a combo of far-apart and nice answers, look out! You can really accelerate your solution process.
(3) Turn that knowledge into Know the Code flash cards:
* Executive Assessment questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009