# Executive Assessment: Fast Math for Faster Solutions - Part 1

*by*, Sep 16, 2017

The Executive Assessment (EA) shares a lot of roots with the GMAT, GMACs flagship graduate business school exam. In certain ways, the EA feels almost like the GMAT on steroidsits even *more* stereotypically GMAT-like than the GMAT itself, if thats possible.

One of those ways has to do with the way in which you can solve math problems. Most of the same math content areas are tested on the EA, but a higher proportion of released EA problems share a certain characteristic: You can use general Fast Math principles to make your job much easierand you can do even more with the overall Fast Math idea on the EA.

Heres the overall idea: Dont do math *that* you don't have to. Dont do math *until* you have to. Before you actually do something you think you need to do, lay it out and ask yourself what the best path is through the mathgiving heavy consideration to estimation and other shortcuts.

Lets try some problems out and see how this really works! All problems in this series are from the free problem sets that appear on the official Executive Assessment website.

Give yourself four minutes (total) to try these two problems; well discuss the solution to the first one today and the solution to the second one in our next installment. They currently appear (as of September 2017) as questions 2 and 3 in the free online quant Problem Solving problem set.

The table below represents the combined net income of all United States companies in each of five sectors for the second quarter of 1996. Which sector had the greatest net income during the first quarter of 1996?(A) Basic Materials

(B) Energy

(C) Industrial

(D) Utilities

(E) Conglomerates

According to the table below, the number of fellows was approximately what percent of the total membership of Organization X?(A) 9%

(B) 12%

(C) 18%

(D) 25%

(E) 35%

Got your answers? Even if youre not sure, guessthats what you want to do on the real test, too, so practice that now (even if your practice consists of saying I have no idea, so Im randomly picking B!).

Ready? Lets do this!

In both cases, youve got a table of information (though that's not actually why I grouped these two together), so the first order of business is to understand what the question wants and what the table tells you.

Heres the table for the first problem:

There are 5 sectors. Each one shows a certain net income for the second quarter and then a percent change from the first quarter. Whats the significance of a negative vs. positive percent change?

Think in terms of real business. If your division had a net income of 4.83 billion this quarter, but that represents a 26% change from last quarter then last quarter was better and this quarter your boss might not be very happy.

Okay, now what do they want to know? Which sector had the greatest net income in the *first* quarter hmm. So were going to have to backwards-engineer this somehow.

Start by jotting down the starting point for each sector and whether that one was higher or lower in the first quarter:

BM: 4.83, 26% ... Q1

E: 7.46, +40% ...... Q1

I: 5, 1% ................Q1

U: 8.57, +303%...Q1

C: 2.07, +10%.......Q1

They want to know which one was the highest once we back out the numbers. Sector C is already the lowest by far and it was even lower last quarter, so its not that one. Eliminate answer (E).

Sector I only went down by 1% in the second quarter, so basically it was still at about 5 in the first quarter. Call that your baseline point and test the other answers against it.

Was Sector BM above or below 5 in the first quarter? The 4.83 figure reflects about a 25% decline from the previous quarter.

If 4.83 represents about a 25% decline from Q1, then it represents about 75% of Q1. Use this to estimate the value for Q1: If the 4.83 figure is about 75%, then what would 25% be?

You would divide 75% by 3 to find 25%, so do the same with the value 4.83.

4.83 is kind of annoying to divide. Try a number that seems like its in the ballpark, like 1.5. (1.5)(3) = 4.5, so the value is around 1.5 (but really a little larger). The 1.5 estimate, then, is on the low side. Keep track of that.

Then, multiply 1.5 by 4 to find 100% or the full value: (1.5)(4) = 6. The value is really a little larger than 6, since 1.5 is a low estimate.

Therefore, sector BM, at 6+, was more than sector I, at 5; eliminate answer (C). Your new baseline point is 6+. Test the remaining answers against this number.

The other two sectors were both lower in Q1. For sector E, 7.46 reflects a 40% increase from Q1. What if the starting number for this sector were 6? What would a 40% increase be?

6 + 40% of 6

To find 40%, find 10%, then multiply by 4. Then add your starting point of 6 back in:

(6)(0.1) = 0.6

(0.6)(4) = 2.4

6 + 2.4 = 8.4

If Q1 were 6, then this sector would have been at 8.4 in the second quarter. It wasnt; it was only at 7.46. Sector E, therefore, was not as high as sector BM, so eliminate choice (B).

Finally, sector U started at 8.57, but that represented a whopping 303% increase over Q1! If you started at 6 and increase that number by 300%, it would be way over 8.57. Sector U also must have started lower than 6, so eliminate choice (D).

The Basic Materials sector is the last one standing. The correct answer is (A).

You could have done all of the above with very precise calculationsbut thats really annoying when you dont have access to a calculator or Excel. Note that you didnt actually have to make very precise calculations because the problem was set up to allow you to estimate even though it didnt tell you that you could.

The beauty of the EA is that this is a *business* test, not a *math* test. Theyre not interested in knowing whether you can do precise math calculations on paper. Theyre interested in knowing whether you have a general number sense that allows you to reason your way to a conclusionwe call that the back of the envelope approach. All my boss really needs to know is which division did best last quarter, not what the exact numbers were, so I can just do a quick-and-dirty approach that addresses the big picture.

Join me next time, when we'll talk about the second problem.

## Key Takeaways for EA Fast Math:

(1) You often dont need to calculate exact values. Look for opportunities to estimate and do back-of-the-envelope calculations wherever possible.

(2) Youre going to need to practice that! First, you need to get yourself into the mindset that this isnt a math test and you actually arent just trying to calculate, calculate, calculate. Second, youre going to need to spend time thinking about how to back-of-the-envelope something in various different situations.

(3) Turn that knowledge into Know the Code flash cards:

* Executive Assessment questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.

###### Recent Articles

###### Archive

- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009