-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Breaking Down GMATPrep Weighted Average Problems (Part 2 of 2)
Last week, we tackled a medium-level GMATPrep weighted average question; click here to read that article before reading this one. This week, well try a harder GMATPrep weighted average question in order to test whether you learned the concept as well as you thought you did. :)
As we discussed last week, every weighted average problem Ive seen (so far!) on GMATPrep is a Data Sufficiency question. This doesnt mean that theyll never give us a Problem Solving weighted average problem, but it does seem to be the case that the test-writers are more concerned with whether we understand how weighted averages work than with whether we can actually do the calculations. Last week, we focused on understanding how weighted averages work via writing some equations. Well try to apply that understanding to our harder problem this week, along with a more efficient solution method.
Lets start with a sample problem. Set your timer for 2 minutes. and GO!
*A contractor combined x tons of gravel mixture that contained 10 percent gravel G, by weight, with y tons of a mixture that contained 2 percent gravel G, by weight, to produce z tons of a mixture that was 5 percent gravel G, by weight. What is the value of x?
(1) y = 10(2) z = 16
There are two kinds of gravel: 10% gravel and 2% gravel. These are our two sub-groups. When the two are combined (in some unknown for now! amounts), we get a 3rd kind:5% gravel. The number of tons of 10% gravel (x) and the number of tons of 2% gravel (y) will add up to the number of tons of 5% gravel (z), or x + y = z. We need to find the number of tons of 10% gravel used in the mixture.
The problem this week throws in a new wrinkle: were not just trying to calculate a ratio this time. We have to have enough info to calculate the actual amount of 10% gravel used. Last week, we never had to worry about the actual number of employees. Well have to keep that in mind to see how things might change.
This problem never mentions the word average. Thats annoying. how are we supposed to tell that this is a weighted average problem? Basically, the problem should talk about 2 sub-groups that are combined in some way to make a 3rd overall group, or mixture of the original 2 sub-groups. The problem will often discuss these groups in terms of percentages (as this problem does) or ratios (as last weeks problem did). That starts to tell us that some kind of averaging is happening.
Next, we know that well either have an unweighted (normal) average or a weighted average, so check to see whether this is a normal average. We start with 10% gravel and 2% gravel. If we mixed exactly equal amounts of each (a normal average), what would the resulting mixture be?
(10+2)/2 = 6
Does the problem say we end up with 6% gravel? No. The amount of 10% gravel is not equal to the amount of 2% gravel. Therefore, this is not a normal average; now we know we have a weighted average problem.
Lets go back to our test of 10% and 2% as an unweighted average. Instead of calculating with a formula (as we did up above and last week), lets draw it out visually. Draw a straight, horizontal line on a piece of paper. Label the left end 2 and the right end 10 to represent our two different sub-groups of gravel:
2--------------------------10
An average of any two numbers will always appear between those two numbers. If the average is unweighted (50% of each is used), then the average will be exactly halfway between the two:
2------------6------------10
If the average is weighted, then it will NOT appear exactly halfway between. It will appear closer to one end or the other, depending upon the weighting. For example, if we have all 2% gravel and zero 10% gravel, whats the average? A 100% weighting of 2% gravel will give us an average of 2.
2--------------------------10
In this problem, they tell us that the average of the mixture is 5, so the average is closer to the 2 end of the line than to the 10 end of the line. (Imagine a tug-of-war between 2 and 10.) Now we know that theres more 2% gravel in the mixture than 10% gravel because the 2 end of the line has pulled the average closer to its end.
2---------5---------------10
To find the weighting: calculate the difference between the two ends of the line. in this case, the difference is 10 2 = 8. Determine how far the dominant end (2, in this case) has pulled the average: calculate how far away the weighted average appears from the other end of the line. In this case, the weighted average 5 is 5 units away from the 10 sub-group.
The dominant end (2) therefore has the weighting 5/8, because it has pulled the weighted average 5/8 of the way towards its end of the line.
The non-dominant end (10) is just the remaining amount of the adds up to 1 figure (from our article last week): 3/8. The non-dominant end (10) has pulled the weighted average only 3/8 of the way toward its end of the line.
Now we know that, of the total mixture, 5/8 of it will be 2% gravel and 3/8 of it will be 10% gravel.
Conceptually, we want to realize that if a problem tells us the two starting points (the ends of the line) and the weighted average (the middle number), then we know we will be able to calculate the relative weightings of the two sub-groups. (This is the exact same concept that we learned on last weeks problem!)
Lets examine the statements to see whether this knowledge might be useful.
Statement 1 says y = 10, which tells us that there are 10 tons of the 2% gravel. If I know I have 10 tons of the 2% gravel, and I also know that 5/8 of all of the gravel will be this 2% gravel, then can I calculate x, the amount of 10% gravel? Yes! 10 tons = 5/8 of the total. Divide each side by 5: 2 tons = 1/8 of the total. Multiply by 3: 6 tons = 3/8 of the total. (I dont actually need to do this calculation on this problem because this is Data Sufficiency, but I would if I saw this on Problem Solving.) Statement 1 is sufficient; eliminate choices B, C, and E.
Statement 2 says z = 16, which tells us that there are 16 tons of the 5% gravel. I also know that z represents the sum of x and y, or 8/8. If I know that 16 is 100%, or 8/8, of the amount, then I can also calculate x: 16 tons = 8/8 of the total. Divide by 8: 2 tons= 1/8 of the total. (Is this starting to look familiar?) Multiply by 3: 6 tons = 3/8 of the total. Statement 2 is also sufficient.
The correct answer is D.
We can simplify this further (for future data sufficiency questions) by saying: if were told the two ends of the line for calculating the average, as well as the overall weighted average, then we can calculate the relative weightings, or ratio, of the sub-groups (just as we did last week). If were also given one of the three actual amounts, then we can calculate all of the actual amounts in the problem. In this case, if wed realized that before examining the statements, we could have asked ourselves, Does the statement give me one of the three real amounts? and quickly recognized that each statement is sufficient by itself.
Key Takeaways for Data Sufficiency Weighted Average Problems:
- Determine that you have a weighted average problem: this occurs when an average is described (even if the word average is not in the problem!), but that average is not a standard 1:1 or equally weighted average.
- Carefully write down what you were asked to solve, then determine what you know, what you dont know, and what you would need to know in order to solve (before you look at the statements).
- Check the given statements to see whether you can find a match (that is, a statement tells you what you had already decided you would need to know in order to solve).
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009