-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Modifier Madness: Breaking Down a GMATPrep SC Problem
This week, were going to analyze a particularly tough GMATPrep Sentence Correction question.
First, set your timer for 1 minute and 15 seconds and try the problem!
Research has shown that when speaking, individuals who have been blind from birth and have thus never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do, and that they will gesture even when conversing with another blind person.
A) have thus never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do, and thatB) have thus never seen anyone gesture but nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way that sighted people do, and
C) have thus never seen anyone gesture, that they nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do, and
D) thus they have never seen anyone gesture, but nonetheless they make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way that sighted people do, and that
E) thus they have never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make hand motions just as frequently and in the same way that sighted people do, and
Okay, have you got your answer? Now, lets dive into this thing! What did you think when you read the original sentence?
This is a very tough problem; when I read the sentence the first time, I actually had to stop and try to strip the sentence down to its basic core, then figure out how the modifiers fit. Until I did that, I couldnt go any further.
First, we have research has shown, a subject-verb pair. Thats the start of the core. The research has shown some things. What are those things (in simple form)? In the following sentence, the words in <brackets> are my simplification of the sentence; these words do not represent the original sentence.
Research has shown THAT when speaking, <certain> individuals nonetheless make hand motions <in a certain way>, and THAT <when speaking> they will gesture <in another way>."
<certain> takes the place of who have been blind from birth and have thus never seen anyone gesture.
<in a certain way> takes the place of just as frequently and in the same way as sighted people do.
<when speaking> is implied by parallelism; this second thing is something that occurs when speaking, just as the first thing is something that occurs when speaking. This parallelism is indicated by the second instance of the word that and is reinforced by the pronoun they, which refers to the subject (individuals) of the first that clause.
<in another way> takes the place of even when conversing with another blind person.
So what weve really got is:
Research has shown THAT when speaking, <certain> individuals nonetheless make <certain> hand motions, and THAT they will gesture <in a certain way>.
Simplify that even more:
Research has shown THAT X, and THAT Y. (X and Y are parallel and are both things that the research has shown.)
In the original sentence, the main word in X is individuals and the main word in Y is they, so we already have proper parallelism.
Are the other four choices also correct just at the core level of the sentence? Part of the core is not underlined: Research has shown THAT X. We know, then, that the Y part should be introduced with another THAT (in order to indicate that these two parts, X and Y, should be parallel). Choices B, C, and E all omit the THAT in front of Y, so they are not correct.
D also uses the core structure and THAT Y, so D is okay as far as that issue is concerned. How do the rest of A and D compare? A begins have thus never seen while D begins thus they have never seen. Whats the major difference? D includes the subject they while A omits a subject. Do we want a subject here? Now we need to dive into one of the modifiers.
individuals who have been blind from birth and have thus never seen anyone gesture nonetheless make
As we discussed earlier, individuals is a subject; the matching verb is make: individuals nonetheless make <certain> hand motions. The words in between individuals and nonetheless are modifiers and because we have two separate modifiers connected by the word and, we need to make those two modifiers parallel.
Individuals who J and K nonetheless make
A: Individuals who [have been blind from birth] and [have thus never seen anyone gesture] nonetheless make
D: Individuals who [have been blind from birth] and [thus they have never seen anyone gesture], but nonetheless they make
So, are they both properly parallel? The J modifier is not part of the underline, so we know that the structure of K has to match the existing structure of J. Js main construction is a verb in the present-perfect tense, so K should have the same structure. In choice A, K does begin with a present-perfect verb, but in choice D, K beings with a noun (they). Thats not parallel. Eliminate D.
Now, were down to one answer choice. The correct answer is A.
There are other ways we could have eliminated answers. For example, choices B and D both use the phrase but nonetheless to indicate a contrast. Each word indicates a contrast by itself, so using both words together is redundant.
Theres another split between just as frequently and in the same way as and just as frequently and in the same way that. Which one is right? The word and once again indicates parallelism, so theres something parallel about the part before and the part after the and. Try each part individually.
She runs just as frequently as he skis. Thats fine. Can we say She runs just as frequently he skis? No we need that second as after the word frequently. The full phrase is just as frequently as. So thats why we have parallelism in this sentence! In the structure just as frequently and in the same way as, the second as applies to both parts (just as frequently as and in the same way as). We cant use just as frequently and in the same way than because that would leave us with either just as frequently (with no second as) or just as frequently than neither of which is correct.
The major take-aways here:
- When doing SC, first attack the errors that you know how to do and reuse your prior analysis as much as you can; you may not have to use all of the errors / differences in order to find the right answer!
- Scan SC answer choices vertically to find differences; dont read horizontally
- Know how to recognize and properly construct noun modifiers and adverbial modifiers
- Watch out for parallelism markers the markers are often little words but they can make a big difference!
* GMATPrep question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Read my other SC Problem breakdown article here.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009