Hey Guys
Can seem to understand the answer behind the following question.
The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the number of children in a room is 5:2:7, respectively. What is the total number of people in the room?
(1) the total number of women and children in the room is 12.
(2) there are fewer than 4 men in the room.
How can the second one be sufficient also?
Many thanks
Lukas
ratio of women
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:56 am
- Followed by:1 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: What is the total number of people in the room?lukaswelker wrote: The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the number of children in a room is 5:2:7, respectively. What is the total number of people in the room?
(1) the total number of women and children in the room is 12.
(2) there are fewer than 4 men in the room.
Given: women : men : children = 5:2:7
So, there are many possible scenarios where the ratio is 5:2:7. Let's LIST a few:
Scenario #1: 5 women, 2 men, 7 children
Scenario #2: 10 women, 4 men, 14 children
Scenario #3: 15 women, 6 men, 21 children
Scenario #4: 20 women, 8 men, 28 children
.
.
.
and so on
Okay, now let's examine the statements:
Statement 1: the total number of women and children in the room is 12.
Let's check some of the scenarios that we LISTED.
Scenario #1: total number of women and children = 12 (NICE!)
Scenario #2: total number of women and children = 24 (no)
Scenario #3: total number of women and children = 36 (no)
...and so on.
We can see that ONLY scenario #1 fits the information in statement 1.
So, there MUST be 5 women, 2 men, and 7 children
In other words, the total number of people in the room MUST equal 14
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: There are FEWER THAN 4 men in the room.
When we check some of the scenarios that we LISTED, we see that ONLY scenario #1 fits the information in statement 2.
So, there MUST be 5 women, 2 men, and 7 children
In other words, the total number of people in the room MUST equal 14
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = D
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
I should point out that this question relies on our ability to recognize that in this REAL WORLD problem, we must use only positive integers.
So, while 0.5 : 0.2 : 0.7 is equivalent to the ratio 5:2:7, we cannot consider this scenario, since we cannot have 0.5 women, 0.2 men, and 0.7 children
Cheers,
Brent
So, while 0.5 : 0.2 : 0.7 is equivalent to the ratio 5:2:7, we cannot consider this scenario, since we cannot have 0.5 women, 0.2 men, and 0.7 children
Cheers,
Brent
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
On the GMAT, problems about ratios are restricted to POSITIVE VALUES.amitmj wrote:Hi Brent,
For the statement 2, can we have Men = 0 as a scenario too ???
As Brett has mentioned, this particular problem is further constrained to POSITIVE INTEGERS.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Well said, MidgeGMATGuruNY wrote:On the GMAT, problems about ratios are restricted to POSITIVE VALUES.amitmj wrote:Hi Brent,
For the statement 2, can we have Men = 0 as a scenario too ???
As Brett has mentioned, this particular problem is further constrained to POSITIVE INTEGERS.
Cheers,
Brent - now with 50% less "t"