Timer
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Official Guide 13, 2015
Data Sufficiency, #75, p. 281
Is the positive two-digit integer N less than 40 ?
1) The units digit of N is 6 more than the tens digit
2) N is 4 less than 4 times the units digit
I have a question on the answer explanation for statement 2. The explanation says that 2 is sufficient because the largest that the units digit of N could be is 9. 4 less than 4 times 9 is 36 -4 = 32. If the maximum possible value of N is 32, then N is definitely less than 40.
I understand that this is sufficient by doing test cases, but I don't understand why using 9 as the units digit is a valid test case. Shouldn't 8 be the only units digit that makes this a valid test case?
If 9 is the units digit of N, and 9 x 4 - 4 = 36 - 4 = 32, then N is 32. But if N is 32, then the units digit of 32 is 2, not 9. How would this be a valid test case?
On the other hand, if 8 is the units digit of N, and 8 x 4 - 4 = 32 - 4 = 28, then N is 28. If N is 28, then the units digit of 28 is 8, which makes this a valid test case because we used 8 as the units digit of N to begin with. Shouldn't this be the only valid test case?
I understand that either way, we arrive at the same answer, which is that this statement is sufficient because N will be less than 40. But what I want to understand is why 9 (or other digits) are valid test cases as the units digit of N, if what you end up getting for N (after you do the multiplication and subtraction) is a 2 digit integer of which the units digit is not the same as the units digit that you began testing with. I want to understand why the answer explanation is different from my understanding and whether I am misinterpreting or misunderstanding the provided statement.
Please let me know if you need me to clarify. Thanks for your help!






















