Logitech CR Set 5

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Logitech CR Set 5

by logitech » Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:41 pm
OA after some discussion
Attachments
CR5.jpg
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:19 am
Location: Orlando
Thanked: 6 times

by raajan_p » Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:58 pm
E is tempting but I dont like the usage of the words "Weekday afternoons" :?


Got some clue now...The stimulus talks about local teenagers doing serious crimes between 3pm and 6pm...

What if the crimes commited by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and Inconsequential vandalism..

I think this option weakens the argument..however I am assuming that between 3pm and 6pm can be considered afternoon!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Portland, OR
Thanked: 6 times

by pbanavara » Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:59 pm
I'd go with B .. seems most appropriate

- pradeep
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:39 pm
pbanavara wrote:I'd go with B .. seems most appropriate

- pradeep
Is this your explanation ? Most appropriate ? Thank you.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:55 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by 720dreaming » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:52 pm
Thinking it's E, but I don't like the fact that they are "available" not mandatory...B suggests that its still a crime, no matter how small. I was looking into D for a while, but then realized its actually the exact opposite.

I'll go with E. Final Answer, no lifeline.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Portland, OR
Thanked: 6 times

by pbanavara » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:53 pm
logitech wrote:
pbanavara wrote:I'd go with B .. seems most appropriate

- pradeep
Is this your explanation ? Most appropriate ? Thank you.
The argument mentions 'serious' crimes and this is the only option that weakens the argument by specifying that the crimes committed between 3 and 6 are 'not serious'. So it seems appropriate - yes.

FYI - If you want mandatory explanations to your questions - mention that in your posting and people who feel like will do so.

- pradeep
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)

Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:48 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 28 times

by vishubn » Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:25 pm
Premise 1 -_Citizens of PK are woriied of increased by freq commtied by local teens
Premise2:In reposne govt institued to keep teenagers in the evening...

even if this succeeds .... problem wil nto solve!!... since most crimes commited by teenars 3 - 6

freq is the worry here.... govet came back and said measure tio make them to stay !

so all kids are part of it ??

if this succeeds on the first place !! how ??


aother places might have a differnt criteria--- so not help ful
b-- we know crimes .. categories of it is not necessary and does not weaken
c--- this instead strengthens the argument
d---Irrelavant
e----COrrect

I am split between B and E ! but i am going for E
but it mentions ( small thefts and vandalism which might not be seriosu)

vishu
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:51 am
Thanked: 13 times

by earth@work » Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:04 pm
IMO:B especially due to mention of "serious crime" in the stimulus.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:55 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by 720dreaming » Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:13 pm
I'm going to have to agree with B (changing my answer from E).

Serious crime vs. petty crime reasoning.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:34 pm
IMO B

Citizens are concerned with Serious crimes

evening most crime happens ( but are they serious ...don't know )
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:59 am
Yes B for me too...

If teenagers do non serious crimes during afternoon..
Then it weakens the conclusion that keeping them home during evening will
not decrease serious crimes....

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:24 am
OA B
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:00 am

by samanthaJ79 » Fri May 13, 2016 3:26 am
I also think that B is more appropriate