A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion. From these definitions we can infer that...
(A) Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
(B) Every valid argument is circular.
(C) No circular argument is valid.
(D) Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
(E) Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.
A OR D??!!
This topic has expert replies
- vk_vinayak
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
- Thanked: 99 times
- Followed by:21 members
I think A.mehaksal wrote:A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion. From these definitions we can infer that...
(A) Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
(B) Every valid argument is circular.
(C) No circular argument is valid.
(D) Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
(E) Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.
According to the stimulus, the definition of Valid sentence: if all premises are true, then conclusion is also true.
Since, in a circular argument conclusion is identical to a premise, it follows that if all premises are true, conclusion must be true. If premises are true and conclusion is also true, it's a valid argument. So, we can say that when all premises of a circular argument are true, it is a valid argument.
- VK
I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Based on the definition provided for a valid argument, my answer is B.
Valid Argument - A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. In my opinion this means that we can have either a correct/wrong premise or a wrong/wrong premise with either a correct/wrong conclusion.
Valid Argument - A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. In my opinion this means that we can have either a correct/wrong premise or a wrong/wrong premise with either a correct/wrong conclusion.
- Attachments
-
- Table for reference
- Bill@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Thanked: 503 times
- Followed by:192 members
- GMAT Score:780
Agreed, and good explanation.vk_vinayak wrote:I think A.mehaksal wrote:A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion. From these definitions we can infer that...
(A) Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
(B) Every valid argument is circular.
(C) No circular argument is valid.
(D) Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
(E) Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.
According to the stimulus, the definition of Valid sentence: if all premises are true, then conclusion is also true.
Since, in a circular argument conclusion is identical to a premise, it follows that if all premises are true, conclusion must be true. If premises are true and conclusion is also true, it's a valid argument. So, we can say that when all premises of a circular argument are true, it is a valid argument.
The first sentence of the stimulus is a convoluted way of saying that the truth of the premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test