SO X, SO Y, THAT Z

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

SO X, SO Y, THAT Z

by akhpad » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:18 am
Source: GMAT Prep

Screen Short:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/files/so_dog ... es_196.jpg
https://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/70 ... bbying.jpg

So dogged were Frances Perkins' investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.

A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that

OA: E

Can you please discuss this?

This is quite clear that we have to follow "so X, that Y" pattern.
YES persistent is an adjective that can come next and that is parallel to "dogged".

The startling is that AND is missing between two SO's.

SO X, SO Y, THAT Z

One more startling is that "SO Y" is set off by a pair of commas. There must be some grammar behind it.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:41 am
Thanked: 177 times
Followed by:85 members

by essaysnark » Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:37 pm
Hi Akhilesh--

Well, EssaySnark is no expert, but here's what we can offer:

This sentence would've still been correct if "and" were included. As we can see from the OA, it is not incorrect without it! Yes, confusing!!

The only way that we were able to solve this one was through pure elimination. We definitely did not recognize that E was correct upon first reading it. Instead, we were able to eliminate all but C and E, based on other errors. Then, we eliminated C because "so" was missing. Which leaves us with E as the only choice.

The usage in this sentence is uncommon but that's what the GMAT is testing for, isn't it??

You probably already broke it down this way, but we see this problem as needing to be analyzed twice:

Does the first phrase work with the second part of the sentence?

"So dogged were Frances Perkins' investigations of the garment industry that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker."

Does the second phrase also work standalone?

"[S]o persistent [was Frances Perkins'] lobbying for wage and hour reform that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker."

This is surely not an official grammar rule, but EssaySnark sees it as the commas setting off the "lobbying" clause to be serving as an implicit "and".

We know our explanations are wobbly... hope this adds some value nonetheless!!

EssaySnark
EssaySnark has MBA application guides for HBS, Stanford, Booth, Wharton, NYU and pretty much any other school you can name - including a fully revised and expanded 2015 Columbia essay guide!
https://essaysnark.com/bookstore/
* * * * * * *
The Indians' Guide to Getting In maps out everything you need to evaluate your own profile and select your schools. https://essaysnark.com/ssguide/quicksnar ... ans-guide/
* * * * * * *
MILITARY CANDIDATES! We've got some pro bono offers just for you: https://essaysnark.com/military-mba/
* * * * * * *
Follow EssaySnark on Twitter!