Source: Knewton
Correctly judging the best design for manufactured products can be a more complicated process than it might seem. Consider, for example, a certain motorcycle company: although the company's designers carefully checked to see that the colors and detailing were consistent for each of its products before releasing the new models, many customers nevertheless returned a certain motorcycle purchased from the company because they were dissatisfied with its design.
The problem implied regarding the company's quality evaluation process is based on doubts regarding which of the following statements?
(A) Color is the most important element of motorcycle design.
(B) The design of detailing is relevant to evaluating the design of the motorcycle.
(C) Motorcycles can be considered representative of manufactured products in general.
(D) Consistency is a sufficient criterion for evaluating the design of motorcycles
(E) It is more appropriate to evaluate the design of groups of manufactured products than to evaluate the design of individual items
OA D
Language of the stem makes the Q tougher than it really is. took me 3 min and 4 sec to answer this one
Correctly judging the best design
This topic has expert replies
- viidyasagar
- Community Manager
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:06 am
- Location: Mumbai, India
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
- tpr-becky
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: Irvine, CA
- Thanked: 199 times
- Followed by:85 members
- GMAT Score:750
This is an assumption type of question - they are asking what the critics use to support their position.
The critics use the failure of the motorcycle company's check for consistency to show that judging design can be more complicated. thus you need a connection between consistency and judging design.
D provides this link becuase it links the premise and the conclusion.
A doesn't work because the passage isn't about most important.
B. doesn't work becuase the conclusion isn't actually about motorcycles.
C. doesn't work because the link isn't strong enough - just connecting motorcycles ot manufactured products doesn't get to the nature of the argument.
E. doesn't work becuase this isn't abut what is more appropriate.
The critics use the failure of the motorcycle company's check for consistency to show that judging design can be more complicated. thus you need a connection between consistency and judging design.
D provides this link becuase it links the premise and the conclusion.
A doesn't work because the passage isn't about most important.
B. doesn't work becuase the conclusion isn't actually about motorcycles.
C. doesn't work because the link isn't strong enough - just connecting motorcycles ot manufactured products doesn't get to the nature of the argument.
E. doesn't work becuase this isn't abut what is more appropriate.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
- viidyasagar
- Community Manager
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:06 am
- Location: Mumbai, India
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
Becky, assumption is a great way to look at the Q, however i thought this was an inference question.
May I take you through my thought process???
Step 1 - Analyze prompt
Situation 1: The company's designers carefully checked to see that the colors and detailing were consistent for each of its products before releasing the new models
Situation 2: Yet many customers returned the motorcycle
Evidence: They were dissatisfied with the design
I noted the slight scope shift (underlined portion) - company was checking for colors and detailing while customers were returning coz they had design issues..
Hence a prediction (conclusion) beckons - Checking for consistency in color and detailing is not enough for guaranteed customer satisfaction on design
Step 2 - Investigate options
A - Color is the most important element of motorcycle design - is too extreme - THRASH
B - The design of detailing is relevant to evaluating the design of the motorcycle - "design of detailing" mixes design and detailing - confusing choice...i'd say HOLD
C - Motorcycles can be considered representative of manufactured products in general - i like the wordings (typical CR) but totally irrelevant - THRASH
D - Consistency is a sufficient criterion for evaluating the design of motorcycles - Again, i don't like this option..coz it does not link "design" and "color"....option is kinda generic, yet the idea of consistency is relevant - HOLD
E - It is more appropriate to evaluate the design of groups of manufactured products than to evaluate the design of individual items - THRASH
Step 3 - Choose
I was stuck between B and D but picked D for the word "consistency"
I know identifying the Q family is not as important as getting the answer right- but i would love to know whether this is an assumption Q or an inference Q....i am confused, please help.....Tx
May I take you through my thought process???
Step 1 - Analyze prompt
Situation 1: The company's designers carefully checked to see that the colors and detailing were consistent for each of its products before releasing the new models
Situation 2: Yet many customers returned the motorcycle
Evidence: They were dissatisfied with the design
I noted the slight scope shift (underlined portion) - company was checking for colors and detailing while customers were returning coz they had design issues..
Hence a prediction (conclusion) beckons - Checking for consistency in color and detailing is not enough for guaranteed customer satisfaction on design
Step 2 - Investigate options
A - Color is the most important element of motorcycle design - is too extreme - THRASH
B - The design of detailing is relevant to evaluating the design of the motorcycle - "design of detailing" mixes design and detailing - confusing choice...i'd say HOLD
C - Motorcycles can be considered representative of manufactured products in general - i like the wordings (typical CR) but totally irrelevant - THRASH
D - Consistency is a sufficient criterion for evaluating the design of motorcycles - Again, i don't like this option..coz it does not link "design" and "color"....option is kinda generic, yet the idea of consistency is relevant - HOLD
E - It is more appropriate to evaluate the design of groups of manufactured products than to evaluate the design of individual items - THRASH
Step 3 - Choose
I was stuck between B and D but picked D for the word "consistency"
I know identifying the Q family is not as important as getting the answer right- but i would love to know whether this is an assumption Q or an inference Q....i am confused, please help.....Tx
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:1 members
Becky,
I am also confused how it is an assumption question.
See the language :
The problem implied regarding the company's quality evaluation process is based on doubts regarding which of the following statements?
I thought that it is a weakening problem.
Can you please break up the above statement, or write it in a simple wording to show that it is an assumption question.
I am also confused how it is an assumption question.
See the language :
The problem implied regarding the company's quality evaluation process is based on doubts regarding which of the following statements?
I thought that it is a weakening problem.
Can you please break up the above statement, or write it in a simple wording to show that it is an assumption question.
- tpr-becky
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: Irvine, CA
- Thanked: 199 times
- Followed by:85 members
- GMAT Score:750
The wording on this problem is difficult but the problem is basically the conclusion to the argument. "correctly judging design can be more complicated" thus the quesiton is asking what is the conclusion based on. Further becuase it asks for doubts regarding one of the statements it is asking for information beyond the argument itself. This is how I got to the fact that it is an assumption. Although I understand your reasoning for inference, I don't believe it is an inference because it isn't asking what was said in the argument but for which statement is in doubt. Inference is more about what we absolutely know to be true from the argument.
D is the better answer because it says they looked for consistency but people were nonetheless dissatisfied.
D is the better answer because it says they looked for consistency but people were nonetheless dissatisfied.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
One of the time consuming problem tht i have seen lately.
Nice explanation.
Nice explanation.
viidyasagar wrote:Source: Knewton
Correctly judging the best design for manufactured products can be a more complicated process than it might seem. Consider, for example, a certain motorcycle company: although the company's designers carefully checked to see that the colors and detailing were consistent for each of its products before releasing the new models, many customers nevertheless returned a certain motorcycle purchased from the company because they were dissatisfied with its design.
The problem implied regarding the company's quality evaluation process is based on doubts regarding which of the following statements?
(A) Color is the most important element of motorcycle design.
(B) The design of detailing is relevant to evaluating the design of the motorcycle.
(C) Motorcycles can be considered representative of manufactured products in general.
(D) Consistency is a sufficient criterion for evaluating the design of motorcycles
(E) It is more appropriate to evaluate the design of groups of manufactured products than to evaluate the design of individual items
OA D
Language of the stem makes the Q tougher than it really is. took me 3 min and 4 sec to answer this one
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:2 members
Yes it is an assumption question. Nice problem and nice explanation.
What if choice A were like "Color is the important element of motorcycle design.",Will it not be a contender of being right ?
I first got stuck on A because color is shown to be an element of design. But later I found that so is detailing and A talks only about one element which is completely baseless. Another assumption could have been
What if choice A were like "Color is the important element of motorcycle design.",Will it not be a contender of being right ?
I first got stuck on A because color is shown to be an element of design. But later I found that so is detailing and A talks only about one element which is completely baseless. Another assumption could have been
- ramprakaashk
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:13 pm
- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
@ramprakaashk
As said in earlier comments it is an assumption type of question and not inference kind
As said in earlier comments it is an assumption type of question and not inference kind
ramprakaashk wrote:It is an inference kind of question.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---