Reading Comprehension

hi i am stuck and i don't see the hypothesis in this passage. i choose C but the answer is B. it looks more like an argument to me.

Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the Old World for the staggering disparity between the indigenous population of America in 1492 new estimates of which soar as high as 100 million, or approximately one-sixth of the human race at that time and the few million full-blooded Native Americans alive at the end of the nineteenth century. There is no doubt that chronic disease was an important factor in the precipitous decline, and it is highly probable that the greatest killer was epidemic disease, especially as manifested in virgin-soil epidemics.

Virgin-soil epidemics are those in which the populations at risk have had no previous contact with the diseases that strike them and are therefore immunologically almost defenseless. That virgin-soil epidemics were important in American history is strongly indicated by evidence that a number of dangerous maladies smallpox, measles, malaria, yellow fever, and undoubtedly several more were unknown in the pre-Columbian New World. The effects of their sudden introduction are demonstrated in the early chronicles of America, which contain reports of horrendous epidemics and steep population declines, confirmed in many cases by recent quantitative analyses of Spanish tribute records and other sources. The evidence provided by the documents of British and French colonies is not as definitive because the conquerors of those areas did not establish permanent settlements and begin to keep continuous records until the seventeenth century, by which time the worst epidemics had probably already taken place. Furthermore, the British tended to drive the native populations away, rather than enslaving them as the Spaniards did, so that the epidemics of British America occurred beyond the range of colonists direct observation.

Even so, the surviving records of North America do contain references to deadly epidemics among the indigenous population. In 1616-1619 an epidemic, possibly of bubonic or pneumonic plague, swept coastal New England, killing as many as nine out of ten. During the 1630's smallpox, the disease most fatal to the Native American people, eliminated half the population of the Huron and Iroquois confederations. In the 1820's fever devastated the people of the Columbia River area, killing eight out of ten of them.

Unfortunately, the documentation of these and other epidemics is slight and frequently unreliable, and it is necessary to supplement what little we do know with evidence from recent epidemics among Native Americans. For example, in 1952 an outbreak of measles among the Native American inhabitants of Ungava Bay, Quebec, affected 99 percent of the population and killed 7 percent, even though some had the benefit of modern medicine. Cases such as this demonstrate that even diseases that are not normally fatal can have devastating consequences when they strike an immunologically defenseless community.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) refute a common misconception

(B) provide support for a hypothesis

(C) analyze an argument

(D) suggest a solution to a dilemma

(E) reconcile opposing viewpoints

I was stuck up between A and B, however A is outside bc in the last paragraph author states that "Unfortunately, the documentation of these bla bla bla" - means there is not enaugh evidences to claim something, thus refute misconseption is not possible as an option.

B - seems ok, bc "Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases...." - means that there is something other than diseases to blame. So, disease-cause seems like a hypothezis. And au. supports it providing many examples and unproven facts.

C - analysis is not performed bc author just provides examples without analizing 'em

hope it helps

8. Which of the following, if newly discovered, would
most seriously weaken the author's argument
concerning the importance of virgin-soil epidemics in
the depopulation of Native Americans?
(A) Evidence setting the pre-Columbian population of
the New World at only 80 million
(B) Spanish tribute records showing periodic population
fluctuations
(C) Documents detailing sophisticated Native American
medical procedures
(D) Fossils indicating Native American cortact with
smallpox prior to 1492
(E) Remains of French settlements dating back to the
sixteenth century

Why can't be B? OA D.

For Q 8, D is the answer because the passage states "Virgin-soil epidemics are those in which the populations at risk have had no previous contact with the diseases that strike them".

However, D states "Fossils indicating Native American cortact with smallpox prior to 1492 ". This breaks the assumption that populations at risk had no contacts with the diseases.

S0laris : For the primary purpose question, what is the hypothesis here? I couldn't understand how B can be the answer.

Thanks,
Viju