a DS that dances.

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:33 pm
Thanked: 3 times

a DS that dances.

by axat » Tue May 26, 2009 5:46 am
Is 2x - 3y < x^2 ?

1) 2x - 3y = -2

2) x>2 and y>0


Answer below.











Answer is D

Now, I feel it should be B. Because B alone can sufficiently give us NO as the answer. Any help will be appreciated, I got this problem from a set provided on this very forum, and thus can't vouch for the authenticity of the answer.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

by figs » Tue May 26, 2009 6:02 am
Is 2x - 3y < x^2 ?

1) 2x - 3y = -2

2) x>2 and y>0

IMO:d

s1) IF 2x-3y is negative always will be less than something square.

s2) if x>2 and y>0 always true

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Re: a DS that dances.

by The GMAT Chef » Fri May 29, 2009 6:44 pm
axat wrote:Is 2x - 3y < x^2 ?

1) 2x - 3y = -2

2) x>2 and y>0


Answer below.



Answer is D

Now, I feel it should be B. Because B alone can sufficiently give us NO as the answer. Any help will be appreciated, I got this problem from a set provided on this very forum, and thus can't vouch for the authenticity of the answer.
Hi axat,

I don't know why you don't see that 1) is straightforward but here is why:

x^2 is always a non-negative number (0 or positive).

but, since 2x - 3y = -2 , 2x -3y is negative and must be always less than x^2 .
1) sufficient

2) is a little bit more involved mathematically.

Just isolate 3y and you get to answer an equivalent but simpler question:
is 3y > 2x - x^2 ?

Now, even though you're given x > 2, plug in 2, the lower bound of x, into the expression 2x - x^2 to see what will happen. Then, the result is 0.
But because the coefficient of x^2 is negative and because x^2 increases faster than 2x, the expression 2x - x^2 will become more negative and therefore smaller as x > 0 .

Since at the same time y > 0 (given in 2)), 3y > 0 as well.

Thus 3y (positive) is always greater than 2x - x^2 (negative) given the conditions in 2).

Finally, this answers the original question.
2) is also sufficient.

D) is the correct answer.


----------------------------------------------
This was a GMAT math recipe from the GMAT Chef.
Dakar Azu is The GMAT Chef. He has sweet recipes for virtually every type of GMAT question, be it quantitative or verbal. Dakar has been teaching the GMAT since 2003 and is the founder of GMATLounge at https://gmatlounge.com , 700-GMAT Club at https://700gmatclub.com ,
and GMATVideos at https://gmatvideos.com .