Is S negative .........

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

Is S negative .........

by akashkumar1987 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:00 am
Is the product of all of the elements in Set S negative?

(1) All of the elements in Set S are negative.
(2) There are 5 negative numbers in Set S.

Answer says the statement 2 is insufficient but why ??

The Correct Answer s 'C'
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:33 am
akashkumar1987 wrote:Answer says the statement 2 is insufficient but why ??
It would seem that if there are 5 negative numbers, then the product should be negative. However, if one of the other numbers is 0, then the product is not negative.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:40 am
akashkumar1987 wrote:Is the product of all of the elements in Set S negative?
(1) All of the elements in Set S are negative.
(2) There are 5 negative numbers in Set S.
Target question: Is the product of all of the elements in Set S negative?

Statement 1: All of the elements in Set S are negative.
There are several scenarios that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
case a: Set S = {-2, -3}, in which case the product is not negative
case b: Set S = {-2, -3, -4}, in which case the product is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: There are 5 negative numbers in Set S.
There are several scenarios that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
case a: Set S = {-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 0}, in which case the product is not negative
case b: Set S = {-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 1}, in which case the product is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
The combined statements tell us that set S consists of 5 negative numbers only, in which case the product is definitely negative
SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent

PS: When posting questions, please use the spoiler function to hide the correct answer. This gives others a chance to try the question
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 60 times
Followed by:10 members

by anuprajan5 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:42 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
akashkumar1987 wrote:Is the product of all of the elements in Set S negative?
(1) All of the elements in Set S are negative.
(2) There are 5 negative numbers in Set S.
Target question: Is the product of all of the elements in Set S negative?

Statement 1: All of the elements in Set S are negative.
There are several scenarios that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
case a: Set S = {-2, -3}, in which case the product is not negative
case b: Set S = {-2, -3, -4}, in which case the product is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: There are 5 negative numbers in Set S.
There are several scenarios that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
case a: Set S = {-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 0}, in which case the product is not negative
case b: Set S = {-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 1}, in which case the product is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
The combined statements tell us that set S consists of 5 negative numbers only, in which case the product is definitely negative
SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent

PS: When posting questions, please use the spoiler function to hide the correct answer. This gives others a chance to try the question

Brent,

Isn't zero a non negative integer? I assume then that you cannot use 0 in the case for statement 2.

REgards
Anup

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:52 am
anuprajan5 wrote: Brent,

Isn't zero a non negative integer? I assume then that you cannot use 0 in the case for statement 2.

REgards
Anup
You're right. Zero is non-negative integer.
However, statement 2 does not say that all of the numbers are negative. In fact, it doesn't say that there are exactly 5 numbers in set S.
All it tells us is that, within set S, you will find 5 negative numbers (and possibly some other non-negative numbers).

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 60 times
Followed by:10 members

by anuprajan5 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:55 am
brilliant! Missed that.

Cheers,
Anup

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:16 am

by gaurvipul » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:54 am
I would mostly be reiterating what the esteemed members have jotted down above, but here are my 2 cents.

Considering first statement:
(1) All of the elements in Set S are negative.

- If we focus on negating this condition, let us consider 2 sets:
- 1 of 2 elements all -ve. {-1,-1} & another of 3 elements all -ve. {-1,-1,-1}

- In first case product will be +ve and in another case product will be -ve.

So first statement is Insufficient

Considering second statement
(2) There are 5 negative numbers in Set S.

Again, if there is one more negative element in this set, product will be +ve, so 2nd statement alone is insufficient

Combining 1 & 2, it can be rephrased as, All of the 5 elements in Set S are negative.
So, product will be surely -ve, hence Sufficient

I think this is from official guide.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

by akashkumar1987 » Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:11 am
@ All -- Thanks Guys