OG11 - History related Difficult (well, in my opinion)

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members
Historians sometimes forget that history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read. These latter activities have their own history, of course, which may impinge in unexpected ways on public events. It is difficult to predict when "new pasts" will overturn established historical interpretations and change the course of history.

In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia which challenged the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South. He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870's. This revisionist view of Jim Crow legislation grew in part from the research that Woodward had done for the NAACP legal campaign during its preparation for Brown v. Board of Education. The Supreme Court had issued its ruling in this epochal desegregation case a few months before Woodward's lectures.

The lectures were soon published as a book, The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Ten years later, in a preface to the second revised edition, Woodward confessed with ironic modesty that the first edition "had begun to suffer under some of the handicaps that might be expected in a history of the American Revolution published in 1776." That was a bit like hearing Thomas Paine apologize for the timing of his pamphlet Common Sense, which had a comparable impact. Although Common Sense also had a mass readership, Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism. Yet, like Paine, Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment, and of how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities. Martin Luther King, Jr., testified to the profound effect of The Strange Career of Jim Crow on the civil rights movement by praising the book and quoting it frequently.

Q1: It can be inferred from the passage that the "prevailing dogma" (line 10) held that
(A) Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South
(B) Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and uniformity in the discriminatory practices of different southern states
(C) Jim Crow laws were passed to erase the social gains that Black people had achieved since Reconstruction
(D) the continuity of racial segregation in the South was disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws
(E) the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were passed to reverse the effect of earlier Jim Crow laws

Q2 Which of the following is the best example of writing that is likely to be subject to the kinds of "handicaps" referred to in line 27?

(A) A history of an auto manufacturing plant written by an employee during an auto-buying boom
(B) A critique of a statewide school-desegregation plan written by an elementary school teacher in that state
(C) A newspaper article assessing the historical importance of a United States President written shortly after the President has taken office
(D) A scientific paper describing the benefits of a certain surgical technique written by the surgeon who developed the technique
(E) Diary entries narrating the events of a battle written by a soldier who participated in the battle

Question: Don't these questions use outside knowledge to answer the questions ? How ?
In Q1 , where in passage we find 100 percent support of giving legal status to well-established discrimintory practices in south ?
In Q2, answer choice A, how do we infer that works published happened during important historical events?
Last edited by GMATMadeEasy on Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:46 am
Also, what is the main point of the passage please?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:58 am
IMO DC
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:22 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:18 members

by Ilana@EconomistGMAT » Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:42 am
No outside knowledge is needed:

The relevant sentences are these ones:

C. Vann Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia which challenged the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South. He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870's.

Line 10 says that Woodward challenged the "prevailing dogma", and the next sentence tells us what Woodward said. Woodward argued that "Jim crow laws NOT ONLY codified traditional practice but also were...blah blah blah".

This structure "not only...but also" is the key to finding the inference. Since we know that Woodward challenged prevailing dogma, we can know that his own view (the entire blah blah blah sentence) that comes after BUT ALSO - is a challenge to what most folks thought - the point that follows "not only".

Therefore the idea that Jim Crow laws "codified traditional practice" is the prevailing dogma.

These three words "codified traditional practice" are paraphrased in the answer choice as "giving legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the south". The idea of "codification" is paraphrased as "giving legal status" and "traditional practice" is paraphrased as "well-established discriminatory practices in the south"

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:22 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:18 members

by Ilana@EconomistGMAT » Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:48 am
Regarding the second question - what are we told about the "handicap" in question? Let's look at what the passage says:
"handicaps that might be expected in a history of the American Revolution published in 1776".

In this case, some outside knowledge is needed to know that the American revolution took place in 1776. The analogy is with a hypothetical historical work published in the midst of the events.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am
Location: Cambridge, MA
Thanked: 192 times
Followed by:121 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:41 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:Historians sometimes forget that history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read. These latter activities have their own history, of course, which may impinge in unexpected ways on public events. It is difficult to predict when "new pasts" will overturn established historical interpretations and change the course of history.

In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia which challenged the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South. He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870's. This revisionist view of Jim Crow legislation grew in part from the research that Woodward had done for the NAACP legal campaign during its preparation for Brown v. Board of Education. The Supreme Court had issued its ruling in this epochal desegregation case a few months before Woodward's lectures.

The lectures were soon published as a book, The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Ten years later, in a preface to the second revised edition, Woodward confessed with ironic modesty that the first edition "had begun to suffer under some of the handicaps that might be expected in a history of the American Revolution published in 1776." That was a bit like hearing Thomas Paine apologize for the timing of his pamphlet Common Sense, which had a comparable impact. Although Common Sense also had a mass readership, Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism. Yet, like Paine, Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment, and of how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities. Martin Luther King, Jr., testified to the profound effect of The Strange Career of Jim Crow on the civil rights movement by praising the book and quoting it frequently.

Q1: It can be inferred from the passage that the "prevailing dogma" (line 10) held that
(A) Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South
(B) Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and uniformity in the discriminatory practices of different southern states
(C) Jim Crow laws were passed to erase the social gains that Black people had achieved since Reconstruction
(D) the continuity of racial segregation in the South was disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws
(E) the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were passed to reverse the effect of earlier Jim Crow laws

Q2 Which of the following is the best example of writing that is likely to be subject to the kinds of "handicaps" referred to in line 27?

(A) A history of an auto manufacturing plant written by an employee during an auto-buying boom
(B) A critique of a statewide school-desegregation plan written by an elementary school teacher in that state
(C) A newspaper article assessing the historical importance of a United States President written shortly after the President has taken office
(D) A scientific paper describing the benefits of a certain surgical technique written by the surgeon who developed the technique
(E) Diary entries narrating the events of a battle written by a soldier who participated in the battle

Question: Don't these questions use outside knowledge to answer the questions ? How ?
In Q1 , where in passage we find 100 percent support of giving legal status to well-established discrimintory practices in south ?
In Q2, answer choice A, how do we infer that works published happened during important historical events?
Here's my take: We get that Woodward "challenged the prevailing dogma [by arguing] that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870's." I take *both* parts of his argument to be challenges to the prevailing dogma, so the negations of both parts should form elements of the prevailing dogma. So the prevailing dogma must essentially have denied that Jim Crow laws codified traditional practice and similarly have denied that the laws were efforts to erase the progress made by Black people. I think I'd rule OUT answer choice A, because if (A) were the prevailing dogma, the first part of Woodward's argument would actually be concordant with the prevailing dogma. In order for Woodward's argument to be opposed to the prevailing dogma, I need the prevailing dogma to say Jim Crow laws *broke with* traditional practice -- so that the anti-prevailing-dogma-Woodward can then say "No they didn't, they gave formal legal status to these practices." So I'd come to [spoiler](D)[/spoiler] here for that reason.

I think the key to this question (which I hope I've answered correctly!) is determining that even the part of Woodward's argument immediately following the "not only" is challenging the prevailing dogma -- but do correct me if this isn't right!
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:43 am
Ilana@MasterGMAT wrote:No outside knowledge is needed:

Therefore the idea that Jim Crow laws "codified traditional practice" is the prevailing dogma.

These three words "codified traditional practice" are paraphrased in the answer choice as "giving legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the south". The idea of "codification" is paraphrased as "giving legal status" and "traditional practice" is paraphrased as "well-established discriminatory practices in the south"
Thank you so much for such a wonderful explanation.

I am with you except wow do we infer bold face part from the given passage ? I could not make this out .

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am
Location: Cambridge, MA
Thanked: 192 times
Followed by:121 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:49 am
Q2 Which of the following is the best example of writing that is likely to be subject to the kinds of "handicaps" referred to in line 27?

(A) A history of an auto manufacturing plant written by an employee during an auto-buying boom
(B) A critique of a statewide school-desegregation plan written by an elementary school teacher in that state
(C) A newspaper article assessing the historical importance of a United States President written shortly after the President has taken office
(D) A scientific paper describing the benefits of a certain surgical technique written by the surgeon who developed the technique
(E) Diary entries narrating the events of a battle written by a soldier who participated in the battle
Just adding onto Ilana's point (well put indeed!):
"handicaps that might be expected in a history of the American Revolution published in 1776".

In this case, some outside knowledge is needed to know that the American revolution took place in 1776. The analogy is with a hypothetical historical work published in the midst of the events.
The only answer choice that fits this description -- "a historical work published in the midst of the events" -- is [spoiler](C)[/spoiler]. There was initially a question about (A) here, I believe ... but (A) won't work because auto manufacturing is not the same as auto buying. If (A) were to have said, for instance, "A history of the auto buying boom of the mid '50s written in 1956, then it would work, but as it stands, manufacturing is not related to buying, so it doesn't.

Best--
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:50 am
Ashley@VeritasPrep wrote: Here's my take: We get that Woodward "challenged the prevailing dogma [by arguing] that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870's." I take *both* parts of his argument to be challenges to the prevailing dogma, so the negations of both parts should form elements of the prevailing dogma. So the prevailing dogma must essentially have denied that Jim Crow laws codified traditional practice and similarly have denied that the laws were efforts to erase the progress made by Black people. I think I'd rule OUT answer choice A, because if (A) were the prevailing dogma, the first part of Woodward's argument would actually be concordant with the prevailing dogma. In order for Woodward's argument to be opposed to the prevailing dogma, I need the prevailing dogma to say Jim Crow laws *broke with* traditional practice -- so that the anti-prevailing-dogma-Woodward can then say "No they didn't, they gave formal legal status to these practices." So I'd come to [spoiler](D)[/spoiler] here for that reason.

I think the key to this question (which I hope I've answered correctly!) is determining that even the part of Woodward's argument immediately following the "not only" is challenging the prevailing dogma -- but do correct me if this isn't right!
When I did this question and used EXACTLY same reasoning - highlighted in bold.. But opted B for whatsoever reasons :) under pressure.

OA is A .

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:51 am
It is Q130 in OG11 under RC at page 390 in old hard copy edition. This RC is no more there in OG12.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am
Location: Cambridge, MA
Thanked: 192 times
Followed by:121 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:53 am
Well, shoot! Thanks!
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:58 am
What could be primary purpose of this RC ? (It is not there in OG11)

To illustrate how reinterpretation of past could impact other part of history - something of that sort
or rather focus is more on the concrete example .

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:53 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by saxenashobhit » Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:35 pm
For same passage I have doubt on another question

5. The attitude of the author of the passage toward the work of C. Vann Woodward is best described as one of

(A) respectful regard
(B) qualified approbation
(C) implied skepticism
(D) pointed criticism
(E) fervent advocacy

OA - A

My question - While reading passage I felt Woodward knowingly manipulated history which benefited existing politics.

Author makes following comments "Woodward confessed with ironic modesty that " and "Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment, and of how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities"

These give kind of negative connotation and so I was leaning towards negative attitudes

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:53 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by saxenashobhit » Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:34 am
Any replies?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am
Location: Cambridge, MA
Thanked: 192 times
Followed by:121 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:15 am
saxenashobhit wrote:For same passage I have doubt on another question

5. The attitude of the author of the passage toward the work of C. Vann Woodward is best described as one of

(A) respectful regard
(B) qualified approbation
(C) implied skepticism
(D) pointed criticism
(E) fervent advocacy

OA - A

My question - While reading passage I felt Woodward knowingly manipulated history which benefited existing politics.

Author makes following comments "Woodward confessed with ironic modesty that " and "Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment, and of how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities"

These give kind of negative connotation and so I was leaning towards negative attitudes
Ah, see, it's not that Woodward knowingly "manipulated" history, but more like he came up and said "Woah, people, it turns out we've had the wrong understanding of this all along. But in my research I've learned some things that will let us revise our understanding to correct it." He wasn't trying to fool anybody; rather, he was trying to bring out (and it seems, succeeded in bringing out) the actual truth.

Let's look now at "Woodward confessed with ironic modesty..." The point here is twofold. The more basic aspect is that Woodward is (in the author's view) being modest, in that he is in a sense apologizing for "defects" -- or "handicaps," as he puts it -- in a work that in fact was in reality amazingly impactful. In other words, the author is saying that Woodward is giving himself only fraction of the credit he's due for writing a work that had such tremendous impact. The "ironic" is the more nuanced part, but roughly I take it to mean that it's ironic for this apology to be based around the fact that the first edition was published in the midst of the "revolutionary moment," when in fact, the fact that it WAS published in the midst of the "revolutionary moment" was a huge factor in what made it so awesome and far-reaching, just as Thomas Paine's Common Sense was awesome and far-reaching for that reason. On the whole, the author's saying it's ironic for Woodward to have been modest about something he had EVERY reason to be ridiculously proud of.

Finally, we'll look at the other quote you mention -- "Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment, and of how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities." This sentence structure is a bit tricky, but we've got unerring meaning perfect, so Woodward had a perfect sense of ... how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities. So we've got a mythological tradition that was crushing dreams of new possibilities... that tradition is EVIL, because it's crushing dreams of possibilities, and furthermore it's MYTHOLOGICAL, i.e. it's based on myth, not truth. So we've got a thing that's based on lies that is crushing dreams, and then Woodward comes with his perfect sense of how historical evidence ( = legitimate, well-researched evidence) can UNDERMINE the evil myth. So Woodward has a perfect sense of how to use truth to defeat an evil myth. Very complimentary indeed!

Hope this clears it up! (?)
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.