Reading Comprehension

In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy, discovered a layer of clay that revolutionized theories concerning the disappearance of the dinosaur, which had centred on the assumed gradual climatic change. Beneath the two-centimetre-thick layer lay limestone containing fossil organisms from the late Cretaceous, while above it was limestone with early Cenozoic fossils.

Positionally, then, the Berkeley group could place the clay in a period roughly contemporaneous with the disappearance of the dinosaur approximately 63 million years ago. They found that the clay stratum contained an iridium level thirty times greater than that of clays in adjacent strata. As iridium is distributed fairly evenly over time through micrometeoritic impact, the researchers knew that the anomalous matter in the clay must have originated extra-terrestrially; the high iridium level, moreover, indicated a sudden deposition in an exceptional, catastrophic event.

Scientists are sharply divided on the possible causes of so cataclysmic an event. The possibility that the deposition occurred as an aftereffect of a supernova has been discounted: radioactive isotope Pu-244 was absent from the clay, and neither Ir-191 nor Ir-193 were present in significant proportions.

Those who maintain that the material came from within the solar system contend that the earth must have collided during the late Cretaceous with an astral body large enough to have distributed the iridium-rich material over the globe. An asteroid of the required mass would have been approximately ten kilometres in diameter; a comet would have to have been twice as large, since comets are largely composed of ice water.

Trying to fathom the scale of such an event as this is mind boggling. It is true that from space, an object 10-20 miles across colliding with earth would be akin to something smaller than a grain of sand landing on a basketball, it is also the case that an object twenty miles across that landed on earth would be nearly twice as tall as Mt. Everest (the tallest mountain on Earth) and further across than the length of Manhattan. Furthermore, when the body came crashing to Earth it would have been ablaze in an inferno caused by the friction of entry into our atmosphere. To the argument that there is no geological evidence of the impact of such massive objects, Richard Grieve has replied that the clay layer could have resettled after the impact in the form of fallout. Frank Kyte of UCLA asserts that a comet, if disrupted by the earth's gravitational field, would have exposed the surface to a deluge of debris that would not have created major craters. Alternatively, the Berkeley group suggests that an asteroid may have landed in the sea; such a collision would have produced tidal waves eight kilometres high, swamping large areas of the earth.

Whatever the type of body and mode of impact, Walter Alvarez of the Berkeley team argues that the primary effect of the catastrophe was to disrupt the planetary ecology through the suspension of vast clouds of matter in the stratosphere. The effects of the initial impact would have been greatly multiplied, Alvarez argues, as photosynthesis was impeded by the blockage of sunlight; there would then have been a massive disruption at the base of the dinosaur's food chain.

1. The passage discusses a new discovery that may change the way scientists think about one aspect of dinosaurs. It can be inferred that the discovery described in the passage may "revolutionize"(line 4) which aspect of current theories about dinosaurs?

A. The geographical extent of the presumed habitation of the dinosaur
B. The approximate date at which dinosaurs are thought to have become extinct
C. The assumption that dinosaurs became extinct because of a change in their natural environment
D. The rate at which the extinction of the dinosaur is thought to have occurred
E. The notion that dinosaurs became extinct because of the onset of an ice age.

2. According to the passage, the Berkeley group used which of the following to support their hypothesis on the disappearance of the dinosaur?

I. A comparison of the fossil records of various marine strata
II. A comparison of different clay strata near Gubbio, Italy
III. A comparison of marine strata in several locations

A. I only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II and III

3. According to the information presented by the author throughout the passage, scientists used the analysis of the isotopes present in the clay to:

A. estimate the age of the stratum more exactly.
B. determine the extent of meteoritic impact upon the earth.
C. derive a hypothesis concerning the effect of the impact of an extraplanetary body on the earth's ecology.
D. eliminate a possible theory concerning the enriched clay's formation.
E. determine whether dinosaurs were allergic to these

1. The passage discusses a new discovery that may change the way scientists think about one aspect of dinosaurs. It can be inferred that the discovery described in the passage may "revolutionize"(line 4) which aspect of current theories about dinosaurs?

Current Theory - Dinosaurs disappeared over a period of time.
Find aspect of current theory.

A. The geographical extent of the presumed habitation of the dinosaur - Out of scope.
B. The approximate date at which dinosaurs are thought to have become extinct - Current theory doesn't talk about dates.
C. The assumption that dinosaurs became extinct because of a change in their natural environment - This is indeed the theory. Not an aspect of theory.
D. The rate at which the extinction of the dinosaur is thought to have occurred = Possible answer.
E. The notion that dinosaurs became extinct because of the onset of an ice age. - This is similar to C.

I choose option D, from my understanding


2. According to the passage, the Berkeley group used which of the following to support their hypothesis on the disappearance of the dinosaur?

I. A comparison of the fossil records of various marine strata
II. A comparison of different clay strata near Gubbio, Italy
III. A comparison of marine strata in several locations

A. I only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II and III

I think it's a straight forward question and the answer is A.

3. According to the information presented by the author throughout the passage, scientists used the analysis of the isotopes present in the clay to:

According to the information - from the passage, the scientists are trying to link the clay substances to an external impact.

A. estimate the age of the stratum more exactly. - No
B. determine the extent of meteoritic impact upon the earth. - Generic
C. derive a hypothesis concerning the effect of the impact of an extraplanetary body on the earth's ecology. - Yes. Ecology Impact thereby impacting Dinosaurs.
D. eliminate a possible theory concerning the enriched clay's formation. - No
E. determine whether dinosaurs were allergic to these - No.

I'll go with option C

What are the OAs?

Well i choose DAD in 9:30 sec, trying to gain speed.

what is this passage? 8.25min

1) D {easy Inference question: always try to copy paste an inference
In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy, discovered a layer of clay that revolutionized theories concerning the disappearance of the dinosaur

2) D { I know sub-option II is for sure and some confidence on suboption III } GUESSED

3) D {sure about this a little tougher inference but not a zipper}
Scientists are sharply divided on the possible causes of so cataclysmic an event. The possibility that the deposition occurred as an aftereffect of a supernova has been discounted: radioactive isotope Pu-244 was absent from the clay, and neither Ir-191 nor Ir-193 were present in significant proportions

Hi,

What are OAs?

IMO C C C

Thanks!

IMO its C D C...OA's please

CDC in 9:30 mins.