If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2019 1:10 pm

If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

by ktrout2020 » Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:07 pm
If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

(1) 1/m < 1/n
(2) m^2 > n^2

Source: Manhattan Prep

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:08 am
ktrout2020 wrote:If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

(1) 1/m < 1/n
(2) m² > n²
Target question: Is m > n?

Given: mn ≠ 0

Statement 1: 1/m < 1/n
This statement doesn't FEEL sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several values of m and n that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Aside: For more on this idea of plugging in values when a statement doesn't feel sufficient, read my article: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/dat ... lug-values

Statement 2: m² > n²
Before I start choosing numbers to test, I'll see if I can REUSE my numbers from statement 1.
Yes I can! Those same values satisfy the conditions in statement 2.
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
IMPORTANT: Notice that I was able to use the same counter-examples to show that each statement ALONE is not sufficient. So, the same counter-examples will satisfy the two statements COMBINED.
In other words,
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image