Snowballs and environment

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:40 am
Location: India
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:690

Snowballs and environment

by Dean Jones » Sat Dec 17, 2011 4:58 am
Dear Friends,

I was having problems in answering the following question.

Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville creates
unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in
winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate
that we put up with the pollution.
Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting
Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the
following?
A. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of
circumstances
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects
associated with producing that outcome
C. Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree
by a different means
D. Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist's position
in order to be better able to attack it
E. Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of
people actually benefited those people


Please help.

OA after some discussions.

My choice was option E

Regards
Deano.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:5 members

by tuanquang269 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:55 am
Choice E is incorrect because

E. Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people (This group is local resident) actually benefited those people (local resident) => But, the environmentalist talk about different people - cross-country skiers.

I confused between B and C, but I will go with B because I agree with the assumption of argument, which is stated in choice B: "certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects
associated with producing that outcome". This quotation is the assumption of the spokeperson. An environmentalist countered that the negative effect is more than the desirable outcome. So, this choice is correct.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by ruplun » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:08 am
I feel the answer to be B.Please elaborate.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:29 am
IMO: B

Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
Thanked: 52 times
Followed by:5 members

by killer1387 » Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:46 am
straight B