Number prop

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

Number prop

by beater » Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:50 am
If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?
(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:04 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Number prop

by Morgoth » Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:43 am
beater wrote:If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?
(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.

x = 2*3
y = 2*7
105 = 5*3*7

x*y = 2*3*2*7


Statement (1)

x = 3*3, we already know x = 2*3
x could be have 7 and 5 and cannot have 7 and 5. Insufficient.

Statement (2)

y= 5*5
for 105 we need 5*3*7. We already know, y=2*7, x = 2*3

x*y = 5*5*2*7*2*3

Sufficient.

Thus, B is the answer.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: Number prop

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:50 am
Morgoth wrote:
beater wrote:If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?
(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.

x = 2*3
y = 2*7
105 = 5*3*7

x*y = 2*3*2*7

Great breakdown, but I'd go one step further at this point:

For xy to be a multiple of 105, we need at least one 3, 5 and 7 among the factors. We have a 3 and a 7, so the only missing factor is a 5.

(1) x is a multiple of 9

Doesn't say anything about our missing 5: insufficient.

(2) y is a multiple of 25

Yay! 25 = 5*5, so we have our missing factor: sufficient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by beater » Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:00 pm
Perfect explanation Stuart. You simply rock!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:29 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by rahul.s » Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:05 pm
Thank you Stuart :)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:17 am

by ying » Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:34 pm
Thanks Stuart. You made the problem much much more simple.