elected officials

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

elected officials

by thephoenix » Thu May 06, 2010 3:41 am
Some people claim that elected officials must avoid even the appearance of impropriety in office. Yet since actions that give the appearance of impropriety are not necessarily improper, the only reason for an elected official to avoid the appearance of impropriety is to maintain public approval and popularity. No one however, not even a public official, has an obligation to be popular or to maintain public approval.
The argument is structured so as to lead to which one of the following conclusions?
(A) No elected official has an obligation to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
(B) All elected officials have a vested interest in maintaining a high public approval rating.
(C) Elected official who have been scrupulous in satisfying the obligations of their office should ensure that the public is aware of this fact.
(D) The public never approves of an elected official who appears to have behaved improperly in office.
(E) Elected officials who abuse the power of their office have an obligation at least to appear to be fulfilling the obligations of their office.
lsat
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Thu May 06, 2010 4:52 am
thephoenix wrote:Some people claim that elected officials must avoid even the appearance of impropriety in office. Yet since actions that give the appearance of impropriety are not necessarily improper, the only reason for an elected official to avoid the appearance of impropriety is to maintain public approval and popularity. No one however, not even a public official, has an obligation to be popular or to maintain public approval.
The argument is structured so as to lead to which one of the following conclusions?
(A) No elected official has an obligation to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
(B) All elected officials have a vested interest in maintaining a high public approval rating.
(C) Elected official who have been scrupulous in satisfying the obligations of their office should ensure that the public is aware of this fact.
(D) The public never approves of an elected official who appears to have behaved improperly in office.
(E) Elected officials who abuse the power of their office have an obligation at least to appear to be fulfilling the obligations of their office.
lsat
Pick A. Direct Formal Logic!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Thu May 06, 2010 8:55 pm
IMO it's A. Pls post OA.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:39 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:660

by orel » Thu May 06, 2010 9:08 pm
one more A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:21 am
Thanked: 10 times

by saurabhmahajan » Fri May 07, 2010 1:26 am
I think its: D
becoz the statement "the only reason for an elected official to avoid the appearance of impropriety is to maintain public approval and popularity"

Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:2 members

by kstv » Fri May 07, 2010 2:46 am
Feel a bit rusty after a hiatus
but vote for B.
No one however, not even a public official, has an obligation to be popular or to maintain public approval.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:05 pm

by xyztroy » Fri May 07, 2010 10:01 am
I am up for A.

Legendary Member
Posts: 576
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:31 pm
Thanked: 97 times
Followed by:1 members

by liferocks » Fri May 07, 2010 6:15 pm
the structure of the stimuli is like this
first it introduces one opinion.Then it counters the opinion and then again it counter the counter argument.so the tone of the last sentence is like that author is going to provide a reason for the first mentioned opinion.
Now if we see the options

1. just says the last statement which is not the conclusion--incorrect
2. Provides a reason for the first stated opinion---correct
3. Provide example supporting the first statement but does nothing to state the reason--incorrect
4. re phrasing the second sentence--incorrect
5. its clearly mentioned that the elected officials do not have obligation to appear to be fulfilling the obligations of their office. so this is refuting the argument--incorrect

IMO ans B
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll