Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"-at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
A. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B.that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C.that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
D. some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E.some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,
[spoiler]Source: OG13 Q97[/spoiler]
Please explain the usage of "dash" here.
I think that "at some time in .....an event" defines "population bottleneck".
"greatly reducing.......variation." is modifying which clause and why?. Because of "dash", I don't know that on which "subject" this "ing" modifier is acting.
OA is B.
Population Bottleneck
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:19 am
Dash (-) can be used just in the same way as Comma is used. It is a very flexible punctuation.
"at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event" act as a non-essential modifier.
In option "B" that refers back to population bottleneck - which is correct.
In option "A", reducing refers back to the entire clause which is not required here.
"at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event" act as a non-essential modifier.
In option "B" that refers back to population bottleneck - which is correct.
In option "A", reducing refers back to the entire clause which is not required here.
- imskpwr
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:1 members
I don't think that we can replace a "dash" with "," here.GMAT_2010_2707 wrote:Dash (-) can be used just in the same way as Comma is used. It is a very flexible punctuation.
"at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event" act as a non-essential modifier.
In option "B" that refers back to population bottleneck - which is correct.
In option "A", reducing refers back to the entire clause which is not required here.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
COMMA + VERBing should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause. In A, reducing seems to refer to our ancestors, implying that OUR ANCESTORS were greatly reducing their numbers. The intended meaning here is that an EVENT greatly reduced their numbers. Eliminate A.imskpwr wrote:Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"-at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
A. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B.that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C.that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
D. some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E.some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,
[spoiler]Source: OG13 Q97[/spoiler]
Please explain the usage of "dash" here.
I think that "at some time in .....an event" defines "population bottleneck".
"greatly reducing.......variation." is modifying which clause and why?. Because of "dash", I don't know that on which "subject" this "ing" modifier is acting.
OA is B.
So that (in C) and so as (in E) imply PURPOSE. The result is a strange meaning: that our ancestors suffered for the PURPOSE of reducing their numbers. Not the intended meaning. Eliminate C and E.
In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning. Eliminate D.
The correct answer is B.
Like a colon, a dash at the end of a sentence serves to introduce information that explains or defines the preceding clause. The clause that PRECEDES the dash must be INDEPENDENT, but what follows the dash can take on different forms. In the OA, what follows the dash (that our ancestors suffered an event) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- imskpwr
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:1 members
First of all, thanks Mitch for pointing the exact usage of Dash here.GMATGuruNY wrote:COMMA + VERBing should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause. In A, reducing seems to refer to our ancestors, implying that OUR ANCESTORS were greatly reducing their numbers. The intended meaning here is that an EVENT greatly reduced their numbers. Eliminate A.imskpwr wrote:Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"-at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
A. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B.that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C.that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
D. some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E.some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,
[spoiler]Source: OG13 Q97[/spoiler]
Please explain the usage of "dash" here.
I think that "at some time in .....an event" defines "population bottleneck".
"greatly reducing.......variation." is modifying which clause and why?. Because of "dash", I don't know that on which "subject" this "ing" modifier is acting.
OA is B.
So that (in C) and so as (in E) imply PURPOSE. The result is a strange meaning: that our ancestors suffered for the PURPOSE of reducing their numbers. Not the intended meaning. Eliminate C and E.
In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning. Eliminate D.
The correct answer is B.
Like a colon, a dash at the end of a sentence serves to introduce information that explains or defines the preceding clause. The clause that PRECEDES the dash must be INDEPENDENT, but what follows the dash can take on different forms. In the OA, what follows the dash (that our ancestors suffered an event) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
I had no idea that dash was used to define a whole clause here. i thought that it was "population bottleneck",which was defined using dash.
other issue was with "ing" modifier:
1. Some anthropologists believe that...
2. the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck".
3. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event.
there are three clauses.
1 is an Independent Clauses.
2 is also an independent NOUN clause defining "Believe".
3 is // to 2. But, is it dependent clause/independent clause/simply an added information?
Now, "Comma + ing form" should refer to the "subject" of the preceding clause.
so here why is it 2 only?
can it be 1 or 2, as both are preceding clauses?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
COMMA + VERBing should modify the NEAREST preceding subject and verb.imskpwr wrote:First of all, thanks Mitch for pointing the exact usage of Dash here.GMATGuruNY wrote:COMMA + VERBing should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause. In A, reducing seems to refer to our ancestors, implying that OUR ANCESTORS were greatly reducing their numbers. The intended meaning here is that an EVENT greatly reduced their numbers. Eliminate A.imskpwr wrote:Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"-at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
A. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B.that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C.that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
D. some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E.some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,
[spoiler]Source: OG13 Q97[/spoiler]
Please explain the usage of "dash" here.
I think that "at some time in .....an event" defines "population bottleneck".
"greatly reducing.......variation." is modifying which clause and why?. Because of "dash", I don't know that on which "subject" this "ing" modifier is acting.
OA is B.
So that (in C) and so as (in E) imply PURPOSE. The result is a strange meaning: that our ancestors suffered for the PURPOSE of reducing their numbers. Not the intended meaning. Eliminate C and E.
In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning. Eliminate D.
The correct answer is B.
Like a colon, a dash at the end of a sentence serves to introduce information that explains or defines the preceding clause. The clause that PRECEDES the dash must be INDEPENDENT, but what follows the dash can take on different forms. In the OA, what follows the dash (that our ancestors suffered an event) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
I had no idea that dash was used to define a whole clause here. i thought that it was "population bottleneck",which was defined using dash.
other issue was with "ing" modifier:
1. Some anthropologists believe that...
2. the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck".
3. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event.
there are three clauses.
1 is an Independent Clauses.
2 is also an independent NOUN clause defining "Believe".
3 is // to 2. But, is it dependent clause/independent clause/simply an added information?
Now, "Comma + ing form" should refer to the "subject" of the preceding clause.
so here why is it 2 only?
can it be 1 or 2, as both are preceding clauses?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- [email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:44 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
GMATGuruNY wrote:COMMA + VERBing should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause. In A, reducing seems to refer to our ancestors, implying that OUR ANCESTORS were greatly reducing their numbers. The intended meaning here is that an EVENT greatly reduced their numbers. Eliminate A.imskpwr wrote:Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"-at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
A. at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers
B.that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers
C.that some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event so that their numbers were greatly reduced,
D. some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced
E.some time in the past, that our ancestors suffered an event so as to reduce their numbers greatly,
[spoiler]Source: OG13 Q97[/spoiler]
Please explain the usage of "dash" here.
I think that "at some time in .....an event" defines "population bottleneck".
"greatly reducing.......variation." is modifying which clause and why?. Because of "dash", I don't know that on which "subject" this "ing" modifier is acting.
OA is B.
So that (in C) and so as (in E) imply PURPOSE. The result is a strange meaning: that our ancestors suffered for the PURPOSE of reducing their numbers. Not the intended meaning. Eliminate C and E.
In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning. Eliminate D.
The correct answer is B.
Like a colon, a dash at the end of a sentence serves to introduce information that explains or defines the preceding clause. The clause that PRECEDES the dash must be INDEPENDENT, but what follows the dash can take on different forms. In the OA, what follows the dash (that our ancestors suffered an event) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
Hi Mitch,
1. I do not understand how D is incorrect. What is the non-sensical meaning that it is conveying?
2. Also, I do not understand the usage of that in the correct answer. As per your exp. you have mentioned that
that our ancestors suffered an event) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
If these 2 noun clauses are parallel, shouldn't they be connected properly with a conjunction or semicolon?
3. Also, I have read Ron's explanation on Manhattan forum that dash acts as a comma, if such is the case then how can it connect 2 indep clauses?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
D: an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced[email protected] wrote:Hi Mitch,
1. I do not understand how D is incorrect. What is the non-sensical meaning that it is conveying?
Conveyed meaning:
Their numbers were greatly reduced from an event.
Here, the usage of from does not convey a logical meaning.
THE EVENT ITSELF reduced our ancestors' numbers.
Their numbers were not reduced FROM an event.
X was reduced from Y is both illogical and unidiomatic.
Dashes can connect almost anything.2. Also, I do not understand the usage of that in the correct answer. As per your exp. you have mentioned that
that our ancestors suffered an event[/i]) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
If these 2 noun clauses are parallel, shouldn't they be connected properly with a conjunction or semicolon?
Consider SC132 in the OG13:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-13-132-t168495.html
In the OA, dashes serve to interject an ENTIRE SENTENCE into the middle of another sentence.
Do not worry about the correct usage of a dash.
The two that-clauses in the OA are not independent.3. Also, I have read Ron's explanation on Manhattan forum that dash acts as a comma, if such is the case then how can it connect 2 indep clauses?
Each serves as the direct object of believe.
WHAT do anthropologist believe?
They believe two things:
that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"
that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers.
As mentioned above, a dash can serve to connect almost anything.
Here, a dash serves to connect two that-clauses, each a direct object of the preceding verb.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi GMATGuru,GMATGuruNY wrote:D: an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced[email protected] wrote:Hi Mitch,
1. I do not understand how D is incorrect. What is the non-sensical meaning that it is conveying?
Conveyed meaning:
Their numbers were greatly reduced from an event.
Here, the usage of from does not convey a logical meaning.
THE EVENT ITSELF reduced our ancestors' numbers.
Their numbers were not reduced FROM an event.
X was reduced from Y is both illogical and unidiomatic.
Dashes can connect almost anything.2. Also, I do not understand the usage of that in the correct answer. As per your exp. you have mentioned that
that our ancestors suffered an event[/i]) is a noun clause that explains and is parallel with the preceding noun clause (that the homogeneity is the result of a "population bottleneck"). Both noun clauses express what some anthropologists BELIEVE.
If these 2 noun clauses are parallel, shouldn't they be connected properly with a conjunction or semicolon?
Consider SC132 in the OG13:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-13-132-t168495.html
In the OA, dashes serve to interject an ENTIRE SENTENCE into the middle of another sentence.
Do not worry about the correct usage of a dash.
The two that-clauses in the OA are not independent.3. Also, I have read Ron's explanation on Manhattan forum that dash acts as a comma, if such is the case then how can it connect 2 indep clauses?
Each serves as the direct object of believe.
WHAT do anthropologist believe?
They believe two things:
that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck"
that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers.
As mentioned above, a dash can serve to connect almost anything.
Here, a dash serves to connect two that-clauses, each a direct object of the preceding verb.
Does that dash in this case work as 'and'. If not, how two dependent clauses are connected?? It would be something missing?
'anthropologist believe that..................that'
can you clarify pls?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
An appositive is a noun form that serves to explain or define another noun form.Mo2men wrote: Hi GMATGuru,
Does that dash in this case work as 'and'. If not, how two dependent clauses are connected?? It would be something missing?
'anthropologist believe that..................that'
can you clarify pls?
OA: Some anthropologists believe that the genetic homogeneity evident in the world's people is the result of a "population bottleneck" - that at some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event that greatly reduced their numbers and thus our genetic variation.
Here, the two colored that-clauses are both noun forms in that each serves as a direct object of believe.
The blue that-clause serves to explain the red that-clause.
Thus, the blue that-clause can be considered an appositive for the red that-clause.
As I mentioned above, dashes can connect virtually ANYTHING.
Here, a dash connects one that-clause to another.
Since dashes can connect virtually ANYTHING, do not worry about the usage of the dash.
Focus on other issues.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3