1.
" the library at alexandria, the largest in the world ".
Source: OG verbal review
i guess "the largest in the world" is modifying alexandria.
please help!!
appreciate your help!!
This topic has expert replies
- ronniecoleman
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: New Delhi , India
- Thanked: 13 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
- Location: UK
- Thanked: 21 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:680
No my friend -
Largest in the world is modifying the library (the subject).
However, if the sentence were to use a non-essential modifier then alexandria would have been modified.
Example:
The library at alexandria, which is the largest in the world, was destroyed by the Romans.
Here which is the largest in the world is modifying Alexandria due to the introduction of the non-essential modifier 'which'.
Other non-essential modifiers could be which, when, where, who, whom, whose. Well, pretty much all the W's.
Please add/delete from the list of non-essential modifiers if I am incorrect and do let me know as well.
Largest in the world is modifying the library (the subject).
However, if the sentence were to use a non-essential modifier then alexandria would have been modified.
Example:
The library at alexandria, which is the largest in the world, was destroyed by the Romans.
Here which is the largest in the world is modifying Alexandria due to the introduction of the non-essential modifier 'which'.
Other non-essential modifiers could be which, when, where, who, whom, whose. Well, pretty much all the W's.
Please add/delete from the list of non-essential modifiers if I am incorrect and do let me know as well.
- ronniecoleman
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: New Delhi , India
- Thanked: 13 times
thanks a ton rohan:
So The rule says:
if using non essential modifiers ( All Ws) will modifiy preceding noun.
Other wise the subject of the preceding clause or phrase
pls correct me if i am wrong
So The rule says:
if using non essential modifiers ( All Ws) will modifiy preceding noun.
Other wise the subject of the preceding clause or phrase
pls correct me if i am wrong
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
011-27565856
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
- Location: UK
- Thanked: 21 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:680
Do check the W's. So far whatever W's I've encountered have been non-essential.ronniecoleman wrote:thanks a ton rohan:
So The rule says:
if using non essential modifiers ( All Ws) will modifiy preceding noun.
And non-essential modifiers are used right after the comma. For example
This is my uncle John, who lives in Toronto. (Manhattan GMAT example)
Sita loves snowboarding, which is a dangerous sport.
Yup! you got it!ronniecoleman wrote: Other wise the subject of the preceding clause or phrase
pls correct me if i am wrong
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
- Location: UK
- Thanked: 21 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:680
Which, Who, Where - all these can be used without the comma as well, but then they would be essential modifiers and NOT non-essential modifiers.
Example:
This is my uncle John who lives in Toronto.
'which' without a comma is probably wrong
Example:
This is my uncle John who lives in Toronto.
'which' without a comma is probably wrong
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:03 am
- Location: Paris, France
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:730
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
- Thanked: 16 times
@Rohan,
Does the logic holds true for essential modifiers such as "that".
i.e. "that" modifies subject of the preceding clause ?
Does the logic holds true for essential modifiers such as "that".
i.e. "that" modifies subject of the preceding clause ?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
- Thanked: 55 times
- Followed by:1 members
Carloblacksun wrote:just to add my 2 cents,
WHOSE is another modifier that does not need the comma, right?
depends on the usage.
If as an essential modifer, No need
If as a non-essential modifier, surely yes..