Another inequality challange?

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:22 am

Another inequality challange?

by callmemo » Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:05 pm
If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a * |b| < a – b?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0

OA: E

Anyone for an easy explination?
Last edited by callmemo on Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:00 pm
Can u please chekc these 2 things in the question

|a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a – b? Is it a * |b|

Also
Stnt 2 is its ab > 0

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:01 pm
Location: mumbai
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:640

Re: Another inequality challange?

by stubbornp » Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:01 pm
callmemo wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a – b?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab 0

OA: E

Anyone for an easy explination?
Given-|a|>|b|

four possiblities-a=-3,b=-2 a=-3,b=2 a=3,b=-2 a=3,b=2

stmt 1:a<0

two possiblities left a=3,b=-2 a=3,b=2

stmt 2:ab=0

it means a.|b|=0

0<a-b?

we ve four possiblits for a and b---so insufficent


Combine 1 and 2,two possibilies again

Again we are unable to conclude the signs for a and b--

Answer should be E...hope it helps

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:22 am

by callmemo » Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:26 am
I. Not Sufficient

a < 0 => b can be either positive or negative

eg. a = -3, b = -2 or + 2

if b = -2; a * |b| < a – b => true

if b = 2; a * |b| < a – b => false

II. Sufficient

ab >= 0 => Given |a| > |b|; a or b can't be zero. so a,b must be positive.

a=1, b = 2; a * |b| < a – b => false
a=3, b = 2; a * |b| < a – b => false

But OA is E. What am I missing?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:54 am
ab >= 0 => Given |a| > |b|; a or b can't be zero. so a,b must be positive.

a=1, b = 2; a * |b| < a – b => false
a=3, b = 2; a * |b| < a – b => false

But OA is E. What am I missing?
The missing part is your conclusion that a and b must be positive.
We could have a= -3 and b=-2 (as you suggested earlier in your solution)

Also, your first set of numbers to plug in (a=1 and b=2) breaks the condition that |a| > |b|
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Italy
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:720

by mjjking » Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:35 am
Hi guys,

do you think this to be a difficult question, a so called "700 level" question?

thanks!
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:50 am
I'd classify this question somewhere in the 600-700 range.
My $0.02
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:55 pm

by vishu » Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:02 pm
Here's my take on this q:

If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a * |b| < a – b?


(1) a < 0

a =-6, b = 2
-12 < -8 ? yes
a = -3, b = 0
0 < -3? no
Hence, (1) is INSUFFICIENT.


(2) ab >= 0


There can be two cases that satisfy this condition.
Case 1: a <=0 and b <= 0
Case 2: a >=0 and b >= 0


Take case 1: a <=0 and b<=0
a=-3,b=-1
-3 < -2 ? Yes
a = -5, b = 0
0 < -5 ? No

No need to go any further. Hence, (2) is INSUFFICIENT as well.

(3) Taking both (1) and (2) together, we find that a < 0 and b <=0. From case 1 in 2) we know that this is INSUFFICIENT.

So, my answer is E).