Target Test Prep's 2024 GMAT Focus Edition prep is discounted for the BTG community!

Redeem
Target Test Prep
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

MORE DETAILS
Target Test Prep
Magoosh
Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

MORE DETAILS
Magoosh

GMAT PREP Question (Population)

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: GMAT PREP Question (Population)

by Vemuri » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:30 am
I answered 10,800. Please help me understand where I went wrong

I avg the total number which came to 12,000 people per voting district. From this, I subtracted 10% (1,200) to get 10,800. I thought this is the lowest number.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:34 am
bluementor wrote:Experts, I need some help here.

I agree with durgesh's solution above. However, when I attempted this question, I setup the equation as follows:

0.9x + 10x = 132,000
x = 10,900.

What's wrong with the equation that I've setup. I'm quite sure there's a fundamental concept that I'm just not seeing here. Could someone please explain this? Thanks.
It's the '0.9x' which isn't quite right. If one number is 10% larger than another, then the smaller number is not equal to 90% of the larger number. If one number is 90% of another number, then the larger number is actually 10/90 = 11.1% greater than the smaller number, as you can see by using the numbers 90 and 100.

I find Durgesh's approach more natural here, but it would certainly be possible to modify your approach to get the right answer. If x is the population of the larger districts, we want to know the population S of the smallest district:

S + 0.1S = x
S = (1/1.1)*x
S = (10/11)*x

That is, the population S is 90.909... % of x.

Now plug that into your equation in place of '0.9x':

(10/11)*x + 10x = 132,000
(120/11)*x = 132,000
x = 12,100

and S = 11,000.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:29 am
Thanked: 65 times

by bluementor » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:03 am
Ah, I see it now. It's the way percentages work:

When I add 10% to 90 I will get 99. But taking off 10% from 99 does not bring me back to 90.

Thanks Ian. As always, this is very helpful.

-BM-
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:29 am
Thanked: 65 times

by bluementor » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:08 am
mals24 wrote:
bluementor wrote: 0.9x + 10x = 132,000
How did you come up with this equation, as in whats the logic behind it.

What Durgesh has done is that in order to minimize one variable you maximize all the other variables.

So the minimum value = x
population of the other 10 districts < 10% greater than x (1.1x)
since we need the maximum value, we'll take the population of the other 10 districts as = 1.1x

Equation should be x+ 1.1x*10 = 132,000
How did you get 0.9 and 10?
mals24,

Instead of assigning x to the minimum value (as what durgesh did), I have assigned to the maximum value. As Ian pointed out, I will need to use 10/11 instead of 0.9 if I wanted to use my equation, which is of course much more cumbersome.

-BM-
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by mmslf75 » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:23 am
dferm wrote:A certain city with a population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

Can someone give a little light to this problem?

Thanks.
What kinda language is this ?
I fail to undersatnd watis being asked ?

that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:54 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

by valleeny » Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:01 pm
durgesh79 wrote: for x to be min, all other will have the same population equal to 1.1x
I cannot readily see this concept in a blink when it comes to this kind of question. Is there a concept or explanation that I have to understand for this?
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:36 am
You can try this article to see if it helps:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2009/11/ ... -problems
(The second problem discussed in the article is the voting districts problem above.)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:15 pm

by TheUT » Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:15 am
1.1 Min >= Max
For Min to be lowest
1.1 Min = Max

Min + 10 Max = 132000
12 Min = 132000
Min = 11K
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:12 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by SaraLotfy » Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:18 am
Can experts pleaaasseee confirm OA. Thx
Top
Post new topic Post Reply