Is the range of a non-empty set bigger than its mean?
1)All members of are negative
2)The median of set is negative
OA D
What does NON-EMPTY set mean ??
By the way is this question actually a sort of theorem /definition ??
Non-Empty Set
This topic has expert replies
- Lattefah84
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:15 am
that it's not empty ?mmslf75 wrote:Is the range of a non-empty set bigger than its mean?
1)All members of are negative
2)The median of set is negative
OA D
What does NON-EMPTY set mean ??
By the way is this question actually a sort of theorem /definition ??
(sorry)
I don't know actually, it sounds weird...
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:35 am
- Location: SGP
- Thanked: 5 times
question is not weird, you've answered correctly in a way that it's not empty.Lattefah84 wrote:that it's not empty ?mmslf75 wrote:Is the range of a non-empty set bigger than its mean?
1)All members of are negative
2)The median of set is negative
OA D
What does NON-EMPTY set mean ??
By the way is this question actually a sort of theorem /definition ??
(sorry)
I don't know actually, it sounds weird...
set theory basics - non empty set S contains elements e.g. S={1,2,4,100...}
here in question
stmt 1 > take a set of random negative numbers say S={-1,-2,-3,-4-5} for simplicity
Range = max term - min term = -5 -(-1) = -4
mean = sum of terms / number of terms = -15/5 = -3
I tried few combinations Range was lower than mean (i.e. you can answer question as no)
stmt 2 - for median, sort the set elements in ascending order of value, if number of terms = odd then middle term is median, if number of terms is even then median = avg. of middle 2 terms
and median is negative if terms of set are negative, hence it will be repeat of stmt1 hence you can answer question using individual stmts.
Wounded by GMAT but not dead
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
You have calculated it correctly but I think you have made a mistake the max term in the set below will be -1 not -5, -5 should be the lowest term and the range will be greater than the mean.
Same for statement 2.
Same for statement 2.
satish.nagdev wrote: here in question
stmt 1 > take a set of random negative numbers say S={-1,-2,-3,-4-5} for simplicity
Range = max term - min term = -5 -(-1) = -4
mean = sum of terms / number of terms = -15/5 = -3
I tried few combinations Range was lower than mean (i.e. you can answer question as no)
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:35 am
- Location: SGP
- Thanked: 5 times