The guns that were confiscated by police at the scene of last week's crime had been sold at an illegal gun show.
A. The guns that were confiscated by police at the scene of last week's crime had been
B. The police at the scene of last week's crime confiscated the guns that have been
C. The guns that were confiscated by police at the scene of last week's crime have been
D. The guns that were confiscated by police at the scene of last week's crime were
E. Last week the guns that had been confiscated by police in the crime week had been
sc - grockit
This topic has expert replies
- Gurpinder
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:3 members
Last edited by Gurpinder on Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- RyanDark
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:54 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh,PA
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:1 members
IMO A.
We need to show the sequence of events-guns were sold earilier than the last week's event.So we need to use past perfect rather than present perfect ( have been) ,which makes it mean that guns are still being sold.
We need to show the sequence of events-guns were sold earilier than the last week's event.So we need to use past perfect rather than present perfect ( have been) ,which makes it mean that guns are still being sold.
- Gurpinder
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:3 members
Thats what I thought, but thats not the correct answer.RyanDark wrote:IMO A.
We need to show the sequence of events-guns were sold earilier than the last week's event.So we need to use past perfect rather than present perfect ( have been) ,which makes it mean that guns are still being sold.
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- beatthegmatinsept
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 am
- Thanked: 22 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:680
Hey dude howz the prep going? You hanging in there?
Is D missing 'sold' in the end? if yes, I'd go for D. If not, then I'd stick with A.
Is D missing 'sold' in the end? if yes, I'd go for D. If not, then I'd stick with A.
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
- Gurpinder
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:3 members
heyyyy!! prep is going alright, test is in 2 weeks. Lets see . How are you and your prep?beatthegmatinsept wrote:Hey dude howz the prep going? You hanging in there?
Is D missing 'sold' in the end? if yes, I'd go for D. If not, then I'd stick with A.
I have fixed the mistake in the question, I underlined sold in it when it wasn't supposed to be underlined.
Yes. OA: (D)
Can you explain please!
Thanks,
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- beatthegmatinsept
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 am
- Thanked: 22 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:680
The guns that were confiscated by police at the scene of last week's crime had been sold at an illegal gun show.
Usage of 'had been' is redundant, since the above red highlighted parts already tell you the timing of events.
It is confusing though, cuz without the use of 'had been' you might think that the guns were sold illegally AFTER the police confiscated them, but that won't make any sense. So the guns must have been sold illegally BEFORE the police confiscated them.
Prep is going.. not as good as I wanted it to be, but hopefully I'll get there
Usage of 'had been' is redundant, since the above red highlighted parts already tell you the timing of events.
It is confusing though, cuz without the use of 'had been' you might think that the guns were sold illegally AFTER the police confiscated them, but that won't make any sense. So the guns must have been sold illegally BEFORE the police confiscated them.
Prep is going.. not as good as I wanted it to be, but hopefully I'll get there
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:02 am
- gmat_perfect
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:14 members
I know another rule.
Since before and after clearly tells us which is more past, we need not use "had" before "before" and after "after".
The patient died after the doctor had come.
--> Doctor came first.
---> The patient died.
The patient had died before the doctor came.
--> The patient died first.
---> Then the doctor came.
Here, we have seen that the action before "before" and after "after" is more past. If we can assume which action is more past, we need NOT use HAD.
The same deal here. if we know the sequence of events, we are not required to use had to mean more past.
Since before and after clearly tells us which is more past, we need not use "had" before "before" and after "after".
The patient died after the doctor had come.
--> Doctor came first.
---> The patient died.
The patient had died before the doctor came.
--> The patient died first.
---> Then the doctor came.
Here, we have seen that the action before "before" and after "after" is more past. If we can assume which action is more past, we need NOT use HAD.
The same deal here. if we know the sequence of events, we are not required to use had to mean more past.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:1 members
if D is right then does this sentence means that
guns were confiscated and then police sold it in a market ---those guns....?
guns were confiscated and then police sold it in a market ---those guns....?
GMAT score is equally counted as your GPA and 78 clicks can change you life.
- Jim@Grockit
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 162 times
- Followed by:45 members
- GMAT Score:760
Not sure what to tell you all -- I'm looking at this question in the database right now and we have Choice A marked as the correct answer, for the reasons you all have mentioned.
While it IS true that in real English you don't need the past perfect tense in cases where the time sequence is made clear by specifying adverbs and prepositional phrases, this question is based on #37 in the purple OG Verbal review (1st edition), which also has a specific time marker . . . in that one, the GMAT still prefers the past perfect tense for action prior to another one in the simple past.
I don't know why it came up D; it's not what's in the database, and in any case the OG has spoken definitively on the subject. Sorry for the confusion!
While it IS true that in real English you don't need the past perfect tense in cases where the time sequence is made clear by specifying adverbs and prepositional phrases, this question is based on #37 in the purple OG Verbal review (1st edition), which also has a specific time marker . . . in that one, the GMAT still prefers the past perfect tense for action prior to another one in the simple past.
I don't know why it came up D; it's not what's in the database, and in any case the OG has spoken definitively on the subject. Sorry for the confusion!
- Gurpinder
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:3 members
Hmmm.... no wonder why there was alot of confusion.Jim@Grockit wrote:Not sure what to tell you all -- I'm looking at this question in the database right now and we have Choice A marked as the correct answer, for the reasons you all have mentioned.
While it IS true that in real English you don't need the past perfect tense in cases where the time sequence is made clear by specifying adverbs and prepositional phrases, this question is based on #37 in the purple OG Verbal review (1st edition), which also has a specific time marker . . . in that one, the GMAT still prefers the past perfect tense for action prior to another one in the simple past.
I don't know why it came up D; it's not what's in the database, and in any case the OG has spoken definitively on the subject. Sorry for the confusion!
Maybe my Internet Browser is messed up. It has been acting weird lately!
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:08 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
Exactly. not using had been obviously changes the meaning. Then it can also mean that the police sold them later. It must be A.frank1 wrote:if D is right then does this sentence means that
guns were confiscated and then police sold it in a market ---those guns....?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:1 members
gmat_perfect@
so which one is better :
(A) The patient died after the doctor had come.
or
(B) The patient died after the doctor came.
(A) The patient had died before the doctor came.
or
(B) The patient died before the doctor came.
Genarally I have seen the people using construction A.
so which one is better :
(A) The patient died after the doctor had come.
or
(B) The patient died after the doctor came.
(A) The patient had died before the doctor came.
or
(B) The patient died before the doctor came.
Genarally I have seen the people using construction A.
- Jim@Grockit
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 162 times
- Followed by:45 members
- GMAT Score:760
Words like "before" and "after" make the chronology impossible to confuse -- you are safe with either, and I would be shocked and dismayed if the GMAT came down on one side or the other in an SC question with no other errors. There is a small difference in connotation, though -- though the meaning is the same, the past perfect suggests a larger gap in time between the two events.paes wrote:gmat_perfect@
so which one is better :
(A) The patient died after the doctor had come.
or
(B) The patient died after the doctor came.
(A) The patient had died before the doctor came.
or
(B) The patient died before the doctor came.
Genarally I have seen the people using construction A.