Dollars

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:57 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Dollars

by N:Dure » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:37 pm
Are they both equal or B is bigger?
Attachments
GRE%20MATH%204_.jpg

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:07 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 447 times
Followed by:88 members

by Rahul@gurome » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:41 pm
For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:36 am
Thanked: 6 times

by kapur.arnav » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:12 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:47 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:10 members
GMAT Score:700

by prachich1987 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:47 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
Thanks Rahul for above.
But if we want to actually calculate the no. of ways for column A,will the answer be 4 ways or it would be more than that?
Plz advise.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:57 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by N:Dure » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:50 pm
Thanks Rahul for your help! I believe since he had 7 correct bills (as in no change) and 3 people to distribute it on, there'll always a remainder and someone will get more than the other.

@ prachich1987: I think there can be more than 4 (1,1,5) (5,1,1) (1,2,4) (1,4,2) (4,1,2)..etc but in the end both ways will yield equal no.s. I don't know how to calculate that though.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:47 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:10 members
GMAT Score:700

by prachich1987 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:03 am
N:Dure wrote:Thanks Rahul for your help! I believe since he had 7 correct bills (as in no change) and 3 people to distribute it on, there'll always a remainder and someone will get more than the other.

@ prachich1987: I think there can be more than 4 (1,1,5) (5,1,1) (1,2,4) (1,4,2) (4,1,2)..etc but in the end both ways will yield equal no.s. I don't know how to calculate that though.
Thanks N:dure
There must be more than 4 ways depending on who gets which coins
For e.g set 1--(1,1,5)
it can be like,
Lucia-1 ,Gomez -1,& Demingo-5
or

Lucia-5 ,Gomez -1,& Demingo-1 & many other ways

I just want to know the way to calculate it.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:01 pm
Thanked: 147 times
Followed by:3 members

by anshumishra » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:12 am
Nice Question.

Actually we don't need to calculate anything.

Check out the Column B : There is no way that you can distribute 7 one dollar bill to three people without having one as at least 3 dollars. So, that means the requirements for Column A and Column B is same.

Hence, they are same.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:47 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:10 members
GMAT Score:700

by prachich1987 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:17 am
anshumishra wrote:Nice Question.

Actually we don't need to calculate anything.

Check out the Column B : There is no way that you can distribute 7 one dollar bill to three people without having one as at least 3 dollars. So, that means the requirements for Column A and Column B is same.

Hence, they are same.
Thanks anshul for your post above
But I am already clear about the problem posted & just wanted to know the total no. ways of calculating column A ways.
It has nothing to do with this problem.
Sorry for creating confusion.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:01 pm
Thanked: 147 times
Followed by:3 members

by anshumishra » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:27 am
kapur.arnav wrote:
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Lets calculate the number of ways in which 7 one $ bills can be distributed among 3 persons (where each can get 0 or more ) :

Direct formula : n+r-1Cr-1 = 7+3-1C3-1 = 9C2

Other way :

We have these seven dollars and want to distribute to A, B and C : |||||||

So we need two separators to separate the sum (I am using *) : One possible distribution can be shown as :

|| * || * ||| (means A gets 2 $, b gets 3$, and C gets 4$)

You can think of it as a collection of 9 symbols ( with 2 * and 7 "|)
So, the problem reduces to selecting positions of two *, out of 9 symbols = 9C2 (which is same as the formula).

Please note, in this case we have not put the restriction that all the people get at least 1$.

Give it a try!
You can use the same technique with the restrictions that all get at least 1$.
I have left for you to try and let us know.

Thanks

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:36 am
Thanked: 6 times

by kapur.arnav » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:19 am
anshumishra wrote:
kapur.arnav wrote:
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Lets calculate the number of ways in which 7 one $ bills can be distributed among 3 persons (where each can get 0 or more ) :

Direct formula : n+r-1Cr-1 = 7+3-1C3-1 = 9C2

Other way :

We have these seven dollars and want to distribute to A, B and C : |||||||

So we need two separators to separate the sum (I am using *) : One possible distribution can be shown as :

|| * || * ||| (means A gets 2 $, b gets 3$, and C gets 4$)

You can think of it as a collection of 9 symbols ( with 2 * and 7 "|)
So, the problem reduces to selecting positions of two *, out of 9 symbols = 9C2 (which is same as the formula).

Please note, in this case we have not put the restriction that all the people get at least 1$.

Give it a try!
You can use the same technique with the restrictions that all get at least 1$.
I have left for you to try and let us know.

Thanks
That should be 4+3-1C3-1... as we need to account for atleast 1 to each... we will take n as = 4 and not as 7....

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:43 am
Hahhahah!!

When did BTG becanme beattheGRE??/ Eric r u starting a new website?? U never said us so!!

@Rahul Dada,

I am just immensely surprised by ur quant instincts...superb!!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:01 pm
Thanked: 147 times
Followed by:3 members

by anshumishra » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:07 am
kapur.arnav wrote:
anshumishra wrote:
kapur.arnav wrote:
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Lets calculate the number of ways in which 7 one $ bills can be distributed among 3 persons (where each can get 0 or more ) :

Direct formula : n+r-1Cr-1 = 7+3-1C3-1 = 9C2

Other way :

We have these seven dollars and want to distribute to A, B and C : |||||||

So we need two separators to separate the sum (I am using *) : One possible distribution can be shown as :

|| * || * ||| (means A gets 2 $, b gets 3$, and C gets 4$)

You can think of it as a collection of 9 symbols ( with 2 * and 7 "|)
So, the problem reduces to selecting positions of two *, out of 9 symbols = 9C2 (which is same as the formula).

Please note, in this case we have not put the restriction that all the people get at least 1$.

Give it a try!
You can use the same technique with the restrictions that all get at least 1$.
I have left for you to try and let us know.

Thanks
That should be 4+3-1C3-1... as we need to account for atleast 1 to each... we will take n as = 4 and not as 7....
Exactly. So, if you are interested in formula :


The number of ways of dividing n identical items among r persons or objects,with no restrictions : n+r-1Cr-1

The number of ways of dividing n identical items among r persons or objects, each one of whom receives at least 1 item :

n-1Cr-1
, So here it is 7-1C3-1 = 6C2

How to derive it using the illustration I provided :

Just give one "|" each to A, B and C, before considering any distribution.

So, now the problem reduces to distributing 4 "|" and 2 "*" among A,B and C, with no restrictions.

Hence , as above it would be : 6C2.

Thanks