BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

First women to draw soldier's pension.

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:35 am
maihuna wrote: BTW, D is having some other issues as well... parallelism, joined, injured, and was discharged, here injured is not parallel to joined, because injured needs an agent/infinitive to work with it, have you ever heard injured in isolation? was injured is ok....
Thanks Maihuna for nice explanation for kicking out D....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pmFollowed by: 694 members
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:47 am
Someone asked me in another thread to address the past perfect issue here.

We've got a list of three things:
joined
was injured
was discharged

Those three are properly parallel.

WITHIN one of those things, we have a sequence of two events:
was discharged because she had become too ill to serve.

WITHIN that item, we have two events. The first one gets past perfect. The second gets simple past.

We aren't necessarily trying to relate every verb in the sentence to every other verb. In this case, we're only trying to relate the "had become too ill to serve" info to the "was discharged" info.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:59 am
Thanks Stacey.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 18 times

by tanviet » Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:16 am
I think that we do not need past perfect here

we use simple past because "and" can create the following of the last action."and" can say that the last action happen after the previous action

if we use past perfect, it is ambiguous that the last action happen before all 3 actions.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Aug 01, 2009 6:48 am
duongthang wrote:I think that we do not need past perfect here

we use simple past because "and" can create the following of the last action."and" can say that the last action happen after the previous action

if we use past perfect, it is ambiguous that the last action happen before all 3 actions.
Please refer to the post of Stacey and Rahul abt this doubt on this thread only.....

I too had the same doubt....which Stacey and Rahul explained very well.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:14 am

by bonbossamazing » Sat Jul 18, 2015 2:54 am
This question is testing Verb parallelism.

The Correct verb forms in this questions are -
Joined
Was injured
Was discharged

injured - Participial - Verb-ed modifier not a bonafide verb
discharged - Participial - Verb-ed Modifier not a bonafide verb

Only Option A has all forms of verb in parallel.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:11 am

by sagarock » Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:30 am
Mitch sir,why is simple past not justified here and what is the reason to use past perfect here? Is this a unique rule?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Aug 06, 2016 2:28 am
sagarock wrote:what is the reason to use past perfect here?
The past perfect serves to express a past action completed before another past event.
Deborah Sampson was discharged because she had become too ill to serve.
Here, the past action in red (she had become too ill to serve) was completed before the past action in blue (Deborah Sampson was discharged).
For this reason, the action in red is expressed in the past perfect tense.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked