Fianancial benefit
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
OA to follow. Pls explain your answers. Tx
- Attachments
-
Last edited by crackgmat007 on Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
- Thanked: 17 times
IMO D.crackgmat007 wrote:OA to follow. Pls explain your answers. Tx
share of market remaining constant is assumption.
D attacks this.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
- Location: Atlanta
- Thanked: 17 times
Yes D for me to.
Argument assumes that market share would remain constant. D clearly states that the new process would reduce the cost and increase the maeket share.
Argument assumes that market share would remain constant. D clearly states that the new process would reduce the cost and increase the maeket share.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 11:37 am
- Location: kolkata
I think it is C..
If you compare the net gains in investing with that of not investing, then this will prove to be a disadvantage as intial investments might not yield any net gains in the beginning but later might yield enough benefit..
If you compare the net gains in investing with that of not investing, then this will prove to be a disadvantage as intial investments might not yield any net gains in the beginning but later might yield enough benefit..
Peace
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:07 am