until almost 1900 - OG 12

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: toronto
Thanked: 5 times

until almost 1900 - OG 12

by vaishalijain7 » Sat May 30, 2009 6:14 pm
Although various eighteenth- and nineteenth-centuary american poets had professed an interest in native american poetry and had pretended to imitate native american forms in their own works, until almost 1900, scholars and critics did not begin seriously to study traditional native american poetry in native languages.

A. until almost 1900, scholars and critics did not begin seriously to study
B. until almost 1900 scholars and critics had not begun seriously studying
C. not until almost 1900 were scholars and critics to begin seriously to study
D. it was not almost until 1900 when scholars and critics began to seriously study
E. it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying
Last edited by vaishalijain7 on Sat May 30, 2009 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:51 pm

my answer

by rrkan » Sat May 30, 2009 7:05 pm
D is right because , had in the earlier part of the sentence indicates past perfect so there should be past tense in the remaining part of the sentence.
B is not right because of the usage of Begun
E is wrong because of the usage to studying

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: toronto
Thanked: 5 times

by vaishalijain7 » Sat May 30, 2009 7:31 pm
what's wrong with 'A' ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: toronto
Thanked: 5 times

by vaishalijain7 » Sat May 30, 2009 7:36 pm
Sorry in 'E' it's not 'to studying' just 'studying'. it was a typo.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:41 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tdadic84 » Sun May 31, 2009 7:43 am
imo e...

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:25 pm

by virgo80 » Sun May 31, 2009 8:15 am
IMO E

whats the OA ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: toronto
Thanked: 5 times

by vaishalijain7 » Sun May 31, 2009 9:46 am
OA is [spoiler]'E'[/spoiler]. Can anyone please explain the reason?

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Sun May 31, 2009 10:00 am
vaishalijain7 wrote:OA is [spoiler]'E'[/spoiler]. Can anyone please explain the reason?
In not underlined part, we have a past perfect tense hence we need a simple past tense. eliminate A, B and C

Betweem D and E, "It was X that..." is an idiomatic structure and I have seen this as answer in few official questions. this is something to note.

There are other errors too such as:

In D, almost is not modifying 1900
C has subjuncitve "were" while we need a simple past

Can you also post Official explanation, May be I have missed somthing

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: toronto
Thanked: 5 times

by vaishalijain7 » Sun May 31, 2009 2:12 pm
iamcste wrote:
vaishalijain7 wrote:OA is [spoiler]'E'[/spoiler]. Can anyone please explain the reason?
In not underlined part, we have a past perfect tense hence we need a simple past tense. eliminate A, B and C

Betweem D and E, "It was X that..." is an idiomatic structure and I have seen this as answer in few official questions. this is something to note.

There are other errors too such as:

In D, almost is not modifying 1900
C has subjuncitve "were" while we need a simple past

Can you also post Official explanation, May be I have missed somthing
but in 'A' it's simple past only then why did you eliminate 'A'?

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Sun May 31, 2009 3:52 pm
vaishalijain7 wrote:
but in 'A' it's simple past only then why did you eliminate 'A'?
I wasnt confident about comma used after 1900 and " to " in " to study" in A. On the contrary I was quite sure about the construction "It was X that..." in E as I have seen such a construction in OA

can you pls post official explanation

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:07 pm

Re: until almost 1900 - OG 12

by success1111 » Sun May 31, 2009 6:00 pm
vaishalijain7 wrote:Although various eighteenth- and nineteenth-centuary american poets had professed an interest in native american poetry and had pretended to imitate native american forms in their own works, until almost 1900, scholars and critics did not begin seriously to study traditional native american poetry in native languages.

A. until almost 1900, scholars and critics did not begin seriously to study
B. until almost 1900 scholars and critics had not begun seriously studying
C. not until almost 1900 were scholars and critics to begin seriously to study
D. it was not almost until 1900 when scholars and critics began to seriously study
E. it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying

The best answer is E.
First,UNTIL can be used in the form of preposition or conjuction. See below
prep.
Up to the time of: We danced until dawn.
Before (a specified time): She can't leave until Friday.
Scots. Unto; to.

conj.
Up to the time that: We walked until it got dark.
Before: You cannot leave until your work is finished.
To the point or extent that: I talked until I was hoarse

Second, D is correct, in that sense, up to the point of "to seriously study" which splits the infinitive

E corrects the error of splitting the infinitive.
Hope this helps.
Tim
Trust but verify.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by saichaitanyap » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:28 am
d is incorrect. almost modifies 1900 not until

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:17 am
Location: lahore, pakistan

by hamxa » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:57 am
I also narrowed to D and E,
and D has split infinitive, so i will go with E as my choice.

and secondly, not until almost 1900 is alright.

(comments are welcome)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 2:49 am
Thanked: 9 times

by SanjeevK » Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:07 am
IMO E

A and B doesn't depict the contrast
C is awkard
D has split infinitive.