Veritas session - Steinman-Arnett

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

Veritas session - Steinman-Arnett

by reply2spg » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:48 am
When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnett 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995, they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet's breaking up. When comets break up, they
emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result. However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnett 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995, even though telescopes were trained
on it throughout the entire period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up.
(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light.
(C) Gas and dust can be released by ! ssures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.
(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November.
(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up.

No OA

IMO C
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:07 am
Thanked: 9 times

by aloneontheedge » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:52 am
reply2spg wrote:When astronomers observed the comet Steinman-Arnett 3 becoming 1,000 times brighter in September 1995, they correctly hypothesized that its increased brightness was a result of the comet's breaking up. When comets break up, they
emit large amounts of gas and dust, becoming visibly brighter as a result. However, their observations did not reveal comet Steinman-Arnett 3 actually breaking into pieces until November 1995, even though telescopes were trained
on it throughout the entire period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the situation above?

(A) Comets often do not emit gas and dust until several weeks after they have begun to break up.
(B) The reason comets become brighter when they break up is that the gas and dust that they emit refract light.
(C) Gas and dust can be released by ! ssures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.
(D) The amount of gas and dust emitted steadily increased during the period from September through November.
(E) The comet passed close to the sun during this period and the gravitational strain caused it to break up.

No OA

IMO C
I would go with C too

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:37 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:4 members

by challenger63 » Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:52 am
(C) Gas and dust can be released by fissures in a comet, even if the comet is not broken all the way through.

C - explains why they saw increased brightness but not breakage until November.

========================
E - out of scope
D - so what? they already saw brightness in September
B - so what? additional information about why brightness was increased but we are trying to answer why they can't see breakage.
A - even more strange, it just intensifies paradox about brightness in the very beginning and lack of breakage.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:59 am
The OA is C

You are exactly correct challenger. Nice job!

David
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course