Each of Hemingway's wives-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.
(A) Each of Hemingway's wives-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-were strong and interesting women,
(B) Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-each of them Hemingway's wives-were strong and interesting women,
(C) Hemingway's wives-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-were all strong and interesting women,
(D) Strong and interesting women-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-each a wife of Hemingway, was
(E) Strong and interesting women-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-every one of Hemingway's wives were
OA: C
P.S: I got this one right but would like to know how HIS in the non-underlined part refers to the Hemingway's ? HIS should directly refer ONLY to Hemingway (a SINGLE NOUN entity-MALE) NOT to Hemingway's , I guess!.
@ Experts - can you please shed light on this aspect ? Also, could you please provide any other instances of Official Questions where such usage is visible ? Much thanks in advance.
Each of Hemingway’s wives—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfe
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:32 am
- Location: India
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:550
I got this one right.
Each of Hemingway's wives-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.
My reasoning is as follows:
(A) was should be used in place of were
(B) each of them Hemingway's wives is not making sense
(C) Plural noun wives + were seems correct
(D) each a wife of Hemingway is not making sense
(E) every one of Hemingway's wives were is not making sense
Even I have the same question as RBBmba@2014 has.
Each of Hemingway's wives-Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh-were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.
My reasoning is as follows:
(A) was should be used in place of were
(B) each of them Hemingway's wives is not making sense
(C) Plural noun wives + were seems correct
(D) each a wife of Hemingway is not making sense
(E) every one of Hemingway's wives were is not making sense
Even I have the same question as RBBmba@2014 has.
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
Are you asking if a possessive pronoun, such as "his," can have a possessive noun as an antecedent? Sure.P.S: I got this one right but would like to know how HIS in the non-underlined part refers to the Hemingway's ? HIS should directly refer ONLY to Hemingway (a SINGLE NOUN entity-MALE) NOT to Hemingway's , I guess!.
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
Here, "her" refers to "Emily Dickinson's."