BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

You're fired!

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 amFollowed by: 550 members
Thanked: 712 times
GMAT Score:770
by DanaJ » Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Source: Veritas Prep

In 2009, a private school spent $200,000 on a building which housed classrooms, offices, and a library. In 2010, the school was unable to earn a profit. Therefore, the principal should be fired.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the author's conclusion EXCEPT:

(A) The principal was hired primarily for her unique ability to establish a strong sense of community, which many parents cited as a quality that kept children enrolled in the school longer.

(B) The new library also features a seating area big enough for all students to participate in cultural arts performances which the head of school intends to schedule more frequently now.

(C) The principal was hired when the construction of the new building was almost completed.

(D) A significant number of families left the school in 2010 because a favorite teacher retired.

(E) More than half of the new families who joined the school in 2010 cited the beautiful new school facility as an important factor in their selection of the school.

Experts: only Veritas Prep experts, please!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:33 am
Thanked: 5 times

by jaxis » Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:14 pm
B for me
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:22 amFollowed by: 3 members
Location: India
Thanked: 5 times

by The Jock » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:47 pm
Seems B to me.
Conclusion: The principal should be fired.
weaken question, so anything giving an alternate choice for school's debacle should weaken.
B is the one that is is not impacting anything here....
Thanks and Regards,
Varun
https://mbayogi.wordpress.com/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:17 amFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 40 times
GMAT Score:760

by jaymw » Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:05 am
I disagree with answer choice B.

B does weaken the conclusion to fire the principle, because the seating area will be good for students for the mentioned reasons.

My choice is C.

When the building was almost completed in 2009, chances are the money had been paid already. That means the 200k don't have any effect on the P&L statement of 2010.

If in 2010 the school loses money, it has nothing to do with the building but rather with the principal's lack of management skills!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by Deepthi Subbu » Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:26 pm
I go with B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:17 amFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 40 times
GMAT Score:760

by jaymw » Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:33 pm
Deepthi Subbu wrote:I go with B
and I assume you have a reason for that?! Tell me!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pmFollowed by: 512 members
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:42 pm
OA is B.

Nice work guys!

Here is the official explanation:

The conclusion that the principal should be fired is weakened by all choices except (B). Answer (A) provides a criteria other than profit according to which the principal should be evaluated. Answer (C) suggests that the principal had no part in the decision to build the new building. Answer (D) suggests that the lack of revenue in 2010 resulted from a cause other than the new building expense. Answer (E) suggests that the lack of profit in 2010 may be short-term, and that revenues will continue to increase as more families are drawn by the new facility. Answer (B) is correct because it does not absolve the principal. It demonstrates a benefit of the new facility but provides no relevant information about the principal's responsibility or lack thereof for the school's financial problems.

Any Questions?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by Deepthi Subbu » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:41 am
jaymw wrote:
Deepthi Subbu wrote:I go with B
and I assume you have a reason for that?! Tell me!
The reason why I dint choose C is - C says that the 'the principal was hired when the construction of the new building was almost completed.'

So this means that she is not directly related to the money that was spent on the construction and hence this weakens the conclusion that she should be fired as she is not a cause for the huge expenditure.

The answer for such questions need not necessarily strengthen the conclusion(extreme condition).

All the other choices except B speak against the principal getting fired.

Also as David said , it provides no relevant information on why she shouldnt be fired.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:59 am
Thanked: 4 times

by missionGMAT007 » Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:58 am
one more for B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:49 am
Thanked: 5 times

by RadiumBall » Mon Dec 06, 2010 1:17 am
I do not agree with B at all, As I understand B only talks of a large library in which the principal plans to hold regular cultural sessions...how does this indicate if the principal should be fired?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pmFollowed by: 512 members
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:06 am
Radium -

This is an exception question. So the correct answer is the one that does not weaken. So if choice B does not weaken then it is the correct answer. So that would mean that you are right. B does not weaken so it is the answer.

Does that help?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:49 am
Thanked: 5 times

by RadiumBall » Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:56 am
Thanks David, Nice Nick Name... :D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:49 pm

by imonline » Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:02 am
went for D
However, after reading explanations agree with B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:03 pmFollowed by: 1 member

by needthis » Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:39 pm
imonline wrote:went for D
However, after reading explanations agree with B
I was also unsure between B and D.
For option D, the teacher being retired is not something one can blame the principle for. Therefore, I was thinking could be a reason why she shouldn't get fired.
But I missed out that the school is losing money because of this event which the principle should be hold responsible for.

Tricky!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:37 am

by m.abdulk » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:38 am
Got a CR right after a long time..!! :)

I went with B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply