Standard police procedure

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:15 pm
Thanked: 2 times

Standard police procedure

by linfongyu » Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:49 pm
From Kaplan's GMAT 800, '08-'09 Edition:

Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together.
(a) Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together
(b) A requirement, according to standard police procedure, is that an officer interview witness separately rather than interviewing them together
(c) Standard police procedure requires an officer to interview witnesses separately rather than to interview them together
(d) It is required in standard police procedure that an officer interviews witnesses separately, not together
(e) Standard police procedure requires that an officer interviews witnesses separately rather than together

When is it an ellipse, when is it not? When is it parallel, when is it not? I am totally flummoxed...
OA: A

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:33 am
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:750

by schakiiieee » Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:09 pm
Dont know anything about the mentioned ellipse but I'd say that this is a sentence that requires the use of the subjunctive form (compared to the other topic). --> A.

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:47 pm
yes 'A' it is - hail to the subjunctive form.

I didn't know till I read it on the other topic that a verb immediately followed by 'that' requires the subjunctive form.

Thanks for posting this question - great exercise.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Portland, OR
Thanked: 6 times

by pbanavara » Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:22 pm
Why not E ? Shouldn't it be 'Officer interviews'

OR

Is it that interviews is referring to the witnesses as the subject rather than the officer ?

-pradeep

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:29 pm
Location: new york
Thanked: 2 times

by Gmatss » Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:46 pm
pbanavara wrote:Why not E ? Shouldn't it be 'Officer interviews'

OR

Is it that interviews is referring to the witnesses as the subject rather than the officer ?

-pradeep
had the sames exact question,, isn't the officer doing the interview? so shouldn't it be singular?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:15 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by linfongyu » Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:02 am
Because it's subjunctive mood, and therefore the second verb, which in this case is the verb interview, must be first person-singular-present form (some say infinitive form without the "to").

More detail:
https://gmat-grammar.blocked/2006/0 ... verbs.html

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:15 am
A for me too..

requires that <- shows the sentence is subjunctive
With a subjunctive " Infinitives are used.. But without a TO "
eg : to action, to resolve etc...will change to ..... action , resolve