Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Dietz foods

Expert replies

by krisraam » Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:03 pm
A year ago, Dietz foods launched a year long advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 millions cans of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however were substantially less than the cost of the advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to futher Dietz's economic interests.

Which one if true, most seriously weakens the argument ?

1. Sales of canned tuna account for a relatively small percentage of Dietz Foods' profits.
Irrelevant
2. Most of the people who bought Dietz's canned tuna for the first time as a result of the campaign were already loyal customers of other Dietz products.
Strengthening
3. A less expensive advertising campaign would have brought in significantly fewer new customers for Dietz's canned tuna than did the campaign Deitz foods launchd last year.
This is best choice avaiable. Though unconvincing..
4. Deitz made money on sales of canned tuna last year.
Irrelevant
5. In each of the past 5 years, there was a steep, industry wide decline in sales of canned tuna.
The sales of Dietz foods increased while overall industry is seeing a decline in sales. But we can't attribute their success to the advertising campaign. There might be some other reason.
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:53 am
I believe the correct answer should be E.
Join the discussion