https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... video/1018
In this question, if we don't use the "U" replacement method and factor the equation the normal way we do, can't we solve it that way? For example, can't we take x-3 as a common factor from this equation?
|x-3|^2 + |x-3|= 20
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Algebric Question: Absolute Solution Sum
This topic has expert replies
-
MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
The problem with doing what you described is that it's not just (x - 3) that we are concerned with.
It's |x - 3|.
So we have two levels we need to solve.
First you need to find the factors that work, the u level factors. Then you need to find all the |x - 3| possibilities that create those u level factors.
Solving for all the possible values of x without substituting u for |x - 3| takes way more work.
It's |x - 3|.
So we have two levels we need to solve.
First you need to find the factors that work, the u level factors. Then you need to find all the |x - 3| possibilities that create those u level factors.
Solving for all the possible values of x without substituting u for |x - 3| takes way more work.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
That was helpful.GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi shahfahad et al.,
When dealing with these types of complex-looking calculations, sometimes it's easiest to 'rewrite' the given equation.
Notice that |X-3| appears twice in the given equation. If we replace that 'term' with a variable, you should see a common pattern emerge...
Y = |X-3|
With that, the original equation....
|X-3|^2 + |X-3| = 20
Becomes....
Y^2 + Y = 20
From here, we can do Quadratic Algebra and solve for Y...
Y^2 + Y - 20 = 0
(Y+5)(Y-4) = 0
So Y = -5, +4
Going back to the original equation, we now know...
|X-3| = -5 OR |X-3| = +4
Since an absolute value CANNOT have a negative result, we can eliminate the first possibility (-5 is NOT an option) and focus on the second.
|X-3| = +4
X = 7 or -1
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
When dealing with these types of complex-looking calculations, sometimes it's easiest to 'rewrite' the given equation.
Notice that |X-3| appears twice in the given equation. If we replace that 'term' with a variable, you should see a common pattern emerge...
Y = |X-3|
With that, the original equation....
|X-3|^2 + |X-3| = 20
Becomes....
Y^2 + Y = 20
From here, we can do Quadratic Algebra and solve for Y...
Y^2 + Y - 20 = 0
(Y+5)(Y-4) = 0
So Y = -5, +4
Going back to the original equation, we now know...
|X-3| = -5 OR |X-3| = +4
Since an absolute value CANNOT have a negative result, we can eliminate the first possibility (-5 is NOT an option) and focus on the second.
|X-3| = +4
X = 7 or -1
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
Matt@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Why not say that
|x-3|² + |x-3| - 20 = 0
(|x-3| + 5)(|x-3| - 4) = 0
|x-3| = -5 (impossible)
or
|x-3| = 4 (x = 7 or x = -1)
|x-3|² + |x-3| - 20 = 0
(|x-3| + 5)(|x-3| - 4) = 0
|x-3| = -5 (impossible)
or
|x-3| = 4 (x = 7 or x = -1)
