Spaceland Strategy Question #6

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:05 am
Location: USA

Spaceland Strategy Question #6

by spaceland prep » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:28 pm
Note: This problem is not representative of GMAT questions, but the strategy for eliminating answers is relevant to solving GMAT questions.

Q. Which of the following must be true?

x > 1
x > 2
x > 3
x > 4
x > 5

How can this question be answered?

Solution

[spoiler]Though this is an extreme example, logic will sometimes eliminate answer choices since only one answer can be correct and one answer has to be correct.

If x is greater than two, then it must also be greater than one. Both answers can't be correct so answer B cannot be correct. The same thing is true of three other answers too--if x is larger than 3, 4, or 5 it is larger than one. C, D, and E cannot be selected without multiple answers being correct. The only answer that doesn't force any other answer also be true is A.

This doesn't mean that the less restrictive answer is always correct, simply that the more restrictive answer cannot be correct.

Additionally, on Roman numeral problems, if one Roman numeral statement is more restrictive than, and inclusive of, another, confirmation of the more restrictive statement confirms the other. Conversely, disqualification of the less restrictive statement also disqualifies the more restrictive statement.[/spoiler]

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 61 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:740

by force5 » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:32 pm
agreed

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:53 am
What if x is 0.5!
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)