Choice B should not be answer as the statement should connect with keywords like reason or since or because .
B is definitely concise but it is not connecting the reason of unclear relationship.
so that it can tell why relationship is not clear.
I think we should go with E.
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Comma Splice
-
nikhilgmat31
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:25 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
-
binit
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:00 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
OA: B.
B gives enough reason after the semicolon, I don't think it is required to explicitly mention 'the reason is.. '
Consider this: I was undecided about the trip; (the reason was) I could accept the offer or just forget it.
E can be safely said wordy, I guess.
B gives enough reason after the semicolon, I don't think it is required to explicitly mention 'the reason is.. '
Consider this: I was undecided about the trip; (the reason was) I could accept the offer or just forget it.
E can be safely said wordy, I guess.
-
deepak4mba
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: London
-
Akrita@Jamboree
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 9:08 pm
I am happy to help.SmarpanGamt wrote:The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.
is still unclear, this is because some studies show
is still unclear; some studies show
are still unclear because some studies show
is still unclear because: some studies show
is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show
The first option solves the problem of comma splice by introduction of conjuction. Please explain Y this choice is incorrect. Also explain your bet.
Firstly, let us look at how we can connect 2 independent sentences - i.e., sentences that have an independent noun + an independent verb and that can be read on their own. There are 2 main ways to do this grammatically -
1. Semi Colon[;]/ Dash[-]/ Colon[:]/ Full stop[.] (Note that the difference in their semantic usage, i.e., when one form of the punctuation is more appropriate than the other is something that is not tested on the GMAT) - John eats (sentence 1); Sam drinks (sentence 2)
2. Comma [optional]+ Conjunction (and, or, but, because, since, although, etc.) - John eats (sentence 1) and/or/but/although.. Sam drinks (sentence 2).
Additionally, we cannot connect 2 independent sentences using a simple comma - this creates a Run-on sentence. This is exactly what option A is guilty of when it introduces the clause starting with "this is" - if this clause weren't there, and the sentence read "The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not. ", then option A would have been correct, albeit a bit wordy due to the presence of a redundant "because of".
Let us go through the other options -
B. is still unclear; some studies show - perfect and concise. Follows rule #1 grammatically
C. are still unclear because some studies show - 'the relationship' is singular
D. is still unclear because: some studies show - After "because", we need a complete clause before the colon
E. is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show - Unnecessarily wordy and redundant, since the semi-colon basically gives a reason (in this construction) as to why the relationship is unclear
Hence, B is the best answer.
