Any literate person who is not lazy can read the classics. Since few literate persons have read the classics, it is clear that most literate persons are lazy.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above is based?
A. Only literate persons can understand the classics.
B. Any literate person should read the classics.
C. Any literate person who is lazy has no chance of reading the classics.
D. Any literate person who will not read the classics is lazy.
E. Any literate person who can read the classics will choose to do so.
Classics
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
- Thanked: 331 times
- Followed by:11 members
I would go with D.
This fits the argument as a 2nd premise(unstated premise->assumption).
Any literate person who is not lazy can read the classics. Any literate person who will not read the classics is lazy.Since few literate persons have read the classics, it is clear that most literate persons are lazy.
Conclusion: It is clear that most literate persons are lazy
This fits the argument as a 2nd premise(unstated premise->assumption).
Any literate person who is not lazy can read the classics. Any literate person who will not read the classics is lazy.Since few literate persons have read the classics, it is clear that most literate persons are lazy.
Conclusion: It is clear that most literate persons are lazy
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am
Close between C and D, I may be worng here but I will go for C. If the question asked for a conclusion I would have gone for D.
But as I said not too sure.
But as I said not too sure.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:04 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:620
IMO D,
say 10 people read classics, 90 people did not read any classics
conclusion: 90 people are Lazy
conclusion would be valid only when people who didn't read classics are called Lazy.
say 10 people read classics, 90 people did not read any classics
conclusion: 90 people are Lazy
conclusion would be valid only when people who didn't read classics are called Lazy.
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
- Nailya
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 2 times
Guys, what do you think about E?
What if these literate just do not choose to read classic? They won't be lazy then. So this assumption is necessary in order to draw a conclusion that they are lazy.
What if these literate just do not choose to read classic? They won't be lazy then. So this assumption is necessary in order to draw a conclusion that they are lazy.
I will also go with D.
The word "Any" gives away for 1 and 2.
For C. Any literate person who is lazy has no chance of reading the classics -> If he had no chance of reading the classic then we cannot conclude he is lazy.
Cancel C.
Again the word "any" gives away for E.
Therefore I choose D. Please correct me guys if my reasoning is wrong.
-a
The word "Any" gives away for 1 and 2.
For C. Any literate person who is lazy has no chance of reading the classics -> If he had no chance of reading the classic then we cannot conclude he is lazy.
Cancel C.
Again the word "any" gives away for E.
Therefore I choose D. Please correct me guys if my reasoning is wrong.
-a
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 7:10 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
- GMAT Score:600
I started out typing this post in agreement with choice D.
But as I re-read the choices, E started making sense.
A literate person who is not lazy, can read a classic [meaning that, they can or can decide not to as well] - I
Opt. E says if a literate person can read the classic he will choose to do so - II
Put I and II together, a literate person, who is not lazy will definitely read a classic.
So if the count is few, given the fact that it's only for literate people, it would most likely mean that most literate people are lazy.
IMO Opt. D would have fit if the argument did not have the word can.
I could be wrong with my reasoning. OA please.
But as I re-read the choices, E started making sense.
A literate person who is not lazy, can read a classic [meaning that, they can or can decide not to as well] - I
Opt. E says if a literate person can read the classic he will choose to do so - II
Put I and II together, a literate person, who is not lazy will definitely read a classic.
So if the count is few, given the fact that it's only for literate people, it would most likely mean that most literate people are lazy.
IMO Opt. D would have fit if the argument did not have the word can.
I could be wrong with my reasoning. OA please.